Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Digital X-rays are here; why aren't you using them?

D A Miles1, R P Langlais, E T Parks

  • 1Department of Oral Health Science, University of Kentucky College of Dentistry, Lexington 40536-0297, USA.

Journal of the California Dental Association
|March 22, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pocket-Sized Versus Conventional Ultrasound for Detecting Fatty Infiltration of the Liver.

Digestive diseases and sciences·2019
Same author

Pre-clinical evaluation of a new dental panoramic radiographic system based on tomosynthesis method.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2010
Same author

Development of a new dental panoramic radiographic system based on a tomosynthesis method.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2010
Same author

Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2009
Same author

Salivary secretion, mucin concentrations and Candida carriage in HIV-infected patients.

Oral diseases·2009
Same author

Density value means in the evaluation of external apical root resorption: an in vitro study for early detection in orthodontic case simulations.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2007
Same journal

A Joint Initiative to Improve Dental Public Health Communication in Maryland.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2026
Same journal

Among Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Methods, Automated Gradient-Boosting Models Accurately Score Intraoral Plaque in Non-Standardized Images.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2025
Same journal

Dentistry: Our Sustainable Future.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2025
Same journal

Current Understanding of the Regulatory Mechanism of Tooth Root Development and Future Perspectives.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2023
Same journal

Advances in Tissue Engineering and Implications for Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2021
Same journal

Cannabis Use and Oral Health in a National Cohort of Adults.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2021
See all related articles

Digital imaging offers cost-effective benefits for dental treatment decisions. This article explores why dentists hesitate to adopt this technology despite its advantages.

Area of Science:

  • Dentistry
  • Radiology
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Digital imaging technology is increasingly accessible and cost-effective for dental practices.
  • Numerous digital systems are now available, with decreasing hardware costs and inexpensive image storage.
  • Insurance companies are preparing to accept digital image files for claims processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the reasons behind the slower-than-expected adoption rate of digital imaging systems by dentists.
  • To identify and address common misconceptions or perceived barriers to digital imaging implementation in dental practices.

Main Methods:

  • Exploration of perceived obstacles to digital imaging adoption.
  • Analysis of the cost-effectiveness and technical requirements of digital imaging systems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the evolving landscape of insurance claim processing for digital radiography.

    • Main Results:

    • The cost of hardware has significantly decreased, and digital image storage is now affordable.
    • Reduced technical time and minimal training requirements (especially with existing paralleling techniques) are noted.
    • Insurance industry readiness to accept digital image files is increasing.

    Conclusions:

    • Despite clear advantages in cost, efficiency, and information gain, dentists' adoption of digital imaging lags.
    • Perceived obstacles may be based on outdated assumptions rather than current technological and economic realities.
    • Addressing these misconceptions is key to accelerating the integration of digital imaging in dentistry.