Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cost effectiveness analysis: some problems of implementation.

C A Watts, M Jackson, J P LoGerfo

    Medical Care
    |April 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Ascorbic Acid Stimulation of Diacetyl Production in Mixed-Strain Lactic Acid Cultures.

    Journal of food protection·2019
    Same author

    A methodological report on household psychometric screening for retardation.

    Community mental health journal·2013
    Same author

    Mental illness and the family physician in britain.

    Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2010
    Same author

    Some afterthoughts on the mental illness survey.

    The Journal of the College of General Practitioners·2009
    Same author

    Microbial reduction of selenate and nitrate: common themes and variations.

    Biochemical Society transactions·2005
    Same author

    The reality of treating dyslipidaemia in patients with coronary heart disease: a primary care survey.

    International journal of clinical practice·2003
    Same journal

    Hepatitis C Virus Cascade of Care in Florida Emergency Departments.

    Medical care·2026
    Same journal

    Association of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Uptake of Diabetes Prevention Interventions.

    Medical care·2026
    Same journal

    Machine Learning for Evaluating the Heterogeneous Effects of Intensive In-Hospital Rehabilitation During the Postacute Phase After Hip Fracture Surgery on Activities of Daily Living.

    Medical care·2026
    Same journal

    Hospital-Physician Integration and Differences in the Use of Orthopedic Care Across Race and Ethnicity.

    Medical care·2026
    Same journal

    Temporal Misalignment and Selection Bias in "Burn Pit Smoke Exposure and Sleep Apnea in US Veterans.

    Medical care·2026
    Same journal

    The Impact of an Oncology Hospital at Home Program on Health Care Costs.

    Medical care·2026
    See all related articles

    Cost-effectiveness analysis in healthcare still requires discounting future benefits, even when dollar values are unclear. Ignoring this can lead to significant bias in health economic evaluations.

    Area of Science:

    • Health economics
    • Medical decision making

    Background:

    • Cost-benefit analyses in healthcare often involve benefits with immeasurable monetary values.
    • Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is sometimes used to avoid assigning dollar values to benefits.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To assert that CEA does not eliminate the need for discounting benefits over time.
    • To discuss the selection of an appropriate discount rate.
    • To demonstrate potential bias from neglecting discounting in health economic evaluations.

    Main Methods:

    • The study theoretically discusses the necessity of discounting in health economic evaluations.
    • It examines the choice of an appropriate discount rate.
    • It uses elective hysterectomy as a case study.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Cost-effectiveness analysis does not circumvent the requirement for discounting benefits that accrue over different time periods.
    • Failure to discount future health benefits can introduce serious bias into the analysis.
    • The choice of discount rate significantly impacts the evaluation outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Discounting is essential in health economic evaluations, regardless of whether cost-benefit or cost-effectiveness analysis is employed.
    • Proper application of discounting is crucial for accurate assessment of healthcare interventions.
    • Ignoring discounting can lead to flawed conclusions and biased resource allocation decisions.