Related Experiment Videos
Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function and glucocorticoid sensitivity in atopic dermatitis
J A Ellison1, L Patel, D W Ray
1Department of Child Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. julieelison@mchtpaeds.freeserve.co.uk
Pediatrics
|April 1, 2000
Summary
Glucocorticoid (GC) resistance in children with atopic dermatitis (AD) is linked to potent topical GC use. Localized resistance in skin, not generalized, may explain severe AD treatment failure.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Dermatology
- Endocrinology
- Immunology
Background:
- Topical glucocorticoids (GCs) are standard treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD).
- Some children with AD exhibit resistance to topical GCs, necessitating investigation into the underlying mechanisms.
- Understanding the extent of GC resistance (generalized vs. localized) is crucial for effective AD management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function in children with moderate to severe AD.
- To determine if GC resistance is generalized or specific to diseased skin.
- To correlate topical GC use with HPA axis function and clinical response in pediatric AD.
Main Methods:
- A low-dose ACTH stimulation test (LDST) was performed on 35 children with AD and 14 healthy controls.
- Patients were grouped based on the potency and route of GC administration.
- Plasma cortisol and ACTH levels were measured to assess HPA axis function.
Main Results:
- HPA axis suppression was infrequent with mild/moderate topical GCs but common with potent GCs or combination therapy.
- Four out of four patients using potent topical GCs and three out of seven using combination therapy failed the LDST.
- Treatment score, reflecting GC potency, area, and duration, correlated with cortisol response (r²=24%).
Conclusions:
- Long-term use of mild or moderate topical GCs rarely causes HPA suppression in pediatric AD.
- Potent topical GCs or combination therapy significantly increases the risk of HPA suppression.
- In severe AD with HPA suppression but lack of clinical response, localized skin resistance to GCs is suggested over generalized resistance.