Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How to evaluate a diagnostic test.

S E Eckert1, G R Goldstein, S Koka

  • 1Assistant Professor, Mayo Graduate School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
|April 11, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Leadership in an academic discipline.

Journal of dentistry·2019
Same author

Carbon and water fluxes from ponderosa pine forests disturbed by wildfire and thinning.

Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America·2010
Same author

Cellular toxicity of mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with an alternative delivery vehicle.

Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics·2006
Same author

Regulation of TNF-alpha-induced IL-6 production in MG-63 human osteoblast-like cells.

Journal of dental research·2002
Same author

Flavor-spin symmetry estimate of the nucleon tensor charge.

Physical review letters·2001
Same author

Ligation of CD40 stimulates the induction of nitric-oxide synthase in microglial cells.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2001
Same journal

Risk factors in peri-implantitis: A narrative review.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Vat photopolymerization-printed zirconia veneered with porcelain: Mechanical properties, fatigue properties, and fractographic analysis.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Marginal and internal fit of zirconia CAD-CAM fabricated with conventional impression and digital scanning techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Clinical outcomes of immediate versus early or conventional loading of single implants: A de novo RCT-level meta-analysis with contextual synthesis of systematic reviews.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Assessment of selective laser-melted removable partial denture frameworks compared with conventionally cast frameworks: A randomized crossover noninferiority trial.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Evidence-based evaluation of large language models in advanced clinical decision-making for removable prosthodontics.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
See all related articles

Understanding diagnostic test accuracy in dentistry is crucial. This review explains sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values to evaluate if a test reliably detects oral carcinoma, aiding clinical decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Dentistry
  • Diagnostic Accuracy
  • Oral Pathology

Background:

  • Diagnostic tests in dentistry are essential for confirming or refuting clinical diagnoses.
  • The accuracy of diagnostic tests varies, leading to potential false positives and false negatives.
  • Evaluating test performance is critical for reliable disease assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain key concepts in diagnostic test evaluation, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios (LRs).
  • To demonstrate the application of these concepts using a study on vital staining for oral carcinoma.
  • To provide methods for evaluating the diagnostic utility of medical literature.

Main Methods:

  • The article reviews fundamental statistical measures of diagnostic test performance.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It analyzes a specific clinical study on vital staining in oral cancer detection.
  • Methods for critical appraisal of scientific literature regarding diagnostic tests are discussed.

    • Main Results:

    • Sensitivity and specificity quantify a test's ability to correctly identify those with and without disease, respectively.
    • Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) indicate the probability of disease given a positive or negative test result.
    • Likelihood ratios (LRs) offer a measure of how much a test result changes the probability of disease.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding diagnostic test metrics is vital for interpreting clinical studies and applying findings to patient care.
    • Vital staining, when evaluated using these metrics, can provide meaningful diagnostic information for oral carcinoma.
    • Proper literature evaluation ensures that diagnostic tests used in dentistry are evidence-based and clinically relevant.