Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lesion segmentation and manual warping to a reference brain: intra- and interobserver reliability.

J A Fiez1, H Damasio, T J Grabowski

  • 1Department of Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.

Human Brain Mapping
|April 19, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Subthalamic nucleus neurons encode syllable sequence and phonetic characteristics during speech.

Journal of neurophysiology·2024
Same author

Articulatory Gain Predicts Motor Cortex and Subthalamic Nucleus Activity During Speech.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2021
Same author

Simultaneously recorded subthalamic and cortical LFPs reveal different lexicality effects during reading aloud.

Journal of neurolinguistics·2021
Same author

Contrasting brain patterns of writing-related DTI parameters, fMRI connectivity, and DTI-fMRI connectivity correlations in children with and without dysgraphia or dyslexia.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2015
Same author

Similarity of structure and the profile of visual recognition defects: a comment on gaffan and heywood.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Common Blood Flow Changes across Visual Tasks: I. Increases in Subcortical Structures and Cerebellum but Not in Nonvisual Cortex.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same journal

Intrinsic Functional Architecture Reflects Individual Differences in Passive Working Memory: An Exploratory Resting-State fMRI Study.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Symptom Overlap and Neurobiological Similarities Between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Tinnitus.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Test-Retest Reliability of Sensorimotor Activity Measured With Spinal Cord fMRI.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

The Human Visual Claustrum Responses to Physical Stimulus Properties and Subjective Content During Movie Viewing.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

miniMORPH: A Morphometry Pipeline for Low-Field MRI in Infants.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Reduced Cerebral Blood Flow in the Early Chronic Phase of Recurrent Concussion Among Female Collegiate-Aged Athletes.

Human brain mapping·2026
See all related articles

This study assessed variability in lesion segmentation and warping for brain damage research. Results show high agreement between observers and automated methods, establishing benchmarks for anatomical interpretation.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medical Imaging
  • Brain Anatomy

Background:

  • Studying acquired brain damage aids understanding of human brain function.
  • Accurate lesion segmentation and warping are crucial for this research method.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify variability in lesion segmentation and warping using the MAP-3 approach.
  • To compare manual (MAP-3) and automated (AIR-3) warping techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Two observers performed lesion segmentation twice on ten subjects.
  • Segmented volumes were warped using MAP-3 (manual) and AIR-3 (automated).
  • Agreement was assessed using volume size, surface distance, and voxel overlap metrics.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • High intra- and interobserver agreement was observed for segmentation and warping.
  • Warped volume surfaces typically differed by less than 3 mm between observers.
  • Automated AIR-3 performance was comparable to manual MAP-3, with notable exceptions.

    • Conclusions:

    • The MAP-3 technique demonstrates high reliability for lesion segmentation and warping.
    • Benchmark parameters for expert and automated lesion transfer are established.
    • Detailed anatomical interpretation of focal brain damage is reliable using MAP-3.