Related Experiment Videos
Learning outcomes of integrative preceptorships
1University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, USA.
Summary
Registered nurse preceptors, nursing faculty, and students perceived ideal and actual learning outcomes differently during integrative preceptorships. Significant discrepancies were found between all groups regarding achieved versus ideal outcomes in nursing education.
Area of Science:
- Nursing Education
- Clinical Preceptorships
- Healthcare Learning Outcomes
Background:
- Integrative preceptorships are crucial for senior generic baccalaureate nursing students.
- Understanding perceptions of learning outcomes is vital for program effectiveness.
- Discrepancies in perception can impact student development and preceptor roles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and compare perceptions of ideal and actual learning outcomes.
- To analyze differences between nursing faculty, preceptors, and students.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of integrative preceptorships in nursing education.
Main Methods:
- Survey methodology involving senior generic baccalaureate nursing students.
- Inclusion of registered nurse preceptors and faculty responsible for student experiences.
- Comparative analysis of perceived ideal versus actual learning outcomes.
Main Results:
- Significant differences identified in perceptions between preceptors and the other two groups.
- Discrepancies noted in both ideal and actual learning outcome perceptions.
- All three groups (faculty, preceptors, students) reported differences between ideal and achieved outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Perceptional gaps exist regarding learning outcomes in integrative preceptorships.
- Addressing these differences is essential for optimizing nursing student education.
- Further research should explore strategies to align perceptions and enhance preceptorship experiences.