Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Influence of spatial and temporal coding on auditory gap detection.

A J Oxenham1

  • 1Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139, USA. oxenham@mit.edu

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|May 2, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Towards a measure of auditory-filter phase response.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2002
Same author

Reconciling frequency selectivity and phase effects in masking.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2001
Same author

Modulation detection interference: effects of concurrent and sequential streaming.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2001
Same author

Forward masking: adaptation or integration?

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2001
Same author

Effects of masker frequency and duration in forward masking: further evidence for the influence of peripheral nonlinearity.

Hearing research·2000
Same author

Level discrimination of sinusoids as a function of duration and level for fixed-level, roving-level, and across-frequency conditions.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

This study on auditory gap detection found that changes in fundamental frequency (f0) significantly impact performance. Spatial location cues, however, did not influence gap detection thresholds, suggesting peripheral coding is dominant.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Auditory perception relies on specialized neural channels.
  • Hypotheses suggest channels tuned to spatial location or fundamental frequency (f0) influence gap detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of spatially tuned and f0-tuned perceptual channels in auditory gap detection.
  • To determine whether peripheral or higher-order neural coding mechanisms dominate gap detection.

Main Methods:

  • Measured gap detection thresholds using broadband noise and harmonic tone complexes as markers.
  • Manipulated interaural time differences (ITD), interaural level differences (ILD), and fundamental frequency (f0) between markers.
  • Presented stimuli binaurally and monaurally.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Interaural level differences (ILD) impaired gap detection, similar to monaural level differences, suggesting peripheral processing.
  • Changing fundamental frequency (f0) between markers deteriorated performance, indicating its importance in gap detection.
  • Spatial location cues (ITD) did not affect gap detection thresholds.

Conclusions:

  • Peripheral auditory coding is crucial for gap detection when marker properties differ.
  • Spatially tuned neural channels play no significant role in gap detection.
  • Higher-order neural coding of f0 has a limited role, with peripheral coding being dominant.