Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Forward masking: adaptation or integration?

A J Oxenham1

  • 1Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139, USA. oxenham@mit.edu

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|March 16, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Towards a measure of auditory-filter phase response.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2002
Same author

Reconciling frequency selectivity and phase effects in masking.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2001
Same author

Modulation detection interference: effects of concurrent and sequential streaming.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2001
Same author

Effects of masker frequency and duration in forward masking: further evidence for the influence of peripheral nonlinearity.

Hearing research·2000
Same author

Influence of spatial and temporal coding on auditory gap detection.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

Level discrimination of sinusoids as a function of duration and level for fixed-level, roving-level, and across-frequency conditions.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

This study investigated forward masking in hearing, finding that peripheral nonlinearity followed by temporal integration explains auditory processing. While adaptation cannot be ruled out, temporal integration models fit the data well.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Forward masking is a phenomenon in auditory perception where a preceding masker affects the detection of a subsequent signal.
  • Understanding the underlying mechanisms, such as neural adaptation or temporal integration, is crucial for explaining auditory processing.
  • Previous research has explored these mechanisms, but a definitive distinction remains challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between neural adaptation and temporal integration as explanations for forward masking.
  • To investigate the role of peripheral nonlinearity in auditory processing during forward masking.
  • To model and simulate the observed effects using established auditory models.

Main Methods:

  • Measured signal detection thresholds for a 4-kHz sinusoid under various forward masking conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Manipulated signal duration and the offset-offset interval between masker and signal.
  • Utilized temporal integration (temporal-window model) and adaptation models for data simulation.

    • Main Results:

    • Thresholds decreased significantly with increasing signal duration up to approximately 20 ms.
    • Temporal integration at short offset-offset intervals exceeded that observed in quiet conditions.
    • Both temporal integration and adaptation models, incorporating peripheral nonlinearity, fit the data, with the temporal-window model showing a slight advantage.

    Conclusions:

    • Forward masking can be explained by peripheral nonlinearity followed by linear temporal integration in the auditory system.
    • The temporal-window model, representing linear temporal integration, appears appropriate for modeling forward masking.
    • While temporal integration is strongly supported, the influence of neural adaptation cannot be entirely excluded due to small predictive differences between models.