Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual encoding of patterns is subject to dual-task interference.

R Dell'Acqua1, P Jolicoeur

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Padova, Italy. dellacqu@psy.unipd.it

Memory & Cognition
|May 3, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Antibacterial prophylaxis and antimicrobial stewardship in the era of innovative therapies for haematological malignancies: transplantation, cellular therapies and new drugs.

JAC-antimicrobial resistance·2026
Same author

Impact of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) on adult haematology oncology patients.

The Journal of infection·2024
Same author

Multishell Diffusion MRI-Based Tractography of the Facial Nerve in Vestibular Schwannoma.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2020
Same author

N2pc reflects two modes for coding the number of visual targets.

Psychophysiology·2018
Same author

Impact of video games on plasticity of the hippocampus.

Molecular psychiatry·2017
Same author

HCV and diabetes: towards a 'sustained' glycaemic improvement after treatment with DAAs?

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2016
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Multitasking with auditory and visual tasks impairs performance, especially when the auditory task is complex. This suggests limited cognitive capacity for processing information from different senses simultaneously.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Cross-modal interference is a known phenomenon in cognitive psychology.
  • Understanding capacity limitations is crucial for designing effective multitasking environments.
  • Previous research has explored dual-task performance, but the specific impact of auditory task complexity on visual encoding requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of auditory task complexity on visual information encoding.
  • To examine the effects of stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) on cross-modal multitasking performance.
  • To determine if cognitive load from an auditory task interferes with a concurrent visual task.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed speeded auditory discrimination tasks (2-alternative or 3-alternative) and a visual matrix comparison task.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Varying stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) were used between the auditory and visual stimuli.
  • A control condition involved participants ignoring the auditory stimulus.

    • Main Results:

    • Accuracy in the visual matrix task decreased as SOA decreased, indicating interference.
    • This interference was more pronounced with a more complex auditory task (3-alternative discrimination).
    • Increased reaction times in the auditory task correlated with decreased accuracy in the visual task, but only when the auditory task was attended.

    Conclusions:

    • Auditory task demands can significantly limit the capacity for encoding visual information.
    • Cross-modal multitasking is subject to capacity limitations, particularly when tasks involve complex cognitive processing.
    • These findings have implications for understanding attention, working memory, and the design of human-computer interactions.