Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Auditory processing and cluttering in young children.

G W Blood1, I M Blood, G Tellis

  • 1Department of Communication Disorders, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802, USA.

Perceptual and Motor Skills
|June 2, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of acknowledging a hearing loss on social interactions.

Journal of communication disorders·1999
Same author

Spatial perception of speech in various signal to noise ratios.

Ear and hearing·1998
Same author

Cortisol responses in adults who stutter: coping preferences and apprehension about communication.

Perceptual and motor skills·1997
Same author

The effects of life stressors and daily stressors on stuttering.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·1997
Same author

Disruptions in auditory and temporal processing in adults who stutter.

Perceptual and motor skills·1996
Same author

A behavioral-cognitive therapy program for adults who stutter: computers and counseling.

Journal of communication disorders·1995
Same journal

Development and Measurement Properties of a Custom-Built Punch Force Dynamometer Based on S-Type Load Cells.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Do Elite Taekwondo Athletes Invest Time for Better Choices? Analysis of Anticipatory Behavior Through a Perception-Action Coupling Task.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Multisensory Contributions in Joint Actions: A Scoping Review.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Proprioceptive Impairment and Joint Position Exposure Time in Relation to Patient-Report Outcome With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Static Tactical Diagrams and Imagination: Differential Effects on Novice and Expert Handball Players.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Autonomic Responses During Kinesthetic Motor Imagery in Healthy Adults: A Multimodal Assessment Using HRV and EDA.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
See all related articles

Children who clutter demonstrated distinct auditory processing differences, particularly in dichotic listening tasks. Their attention strategies showed greater improvement, but they struggled with competing auditory information.

Area of Science:

  • Speech-Language Pathology
  • Auditory Processing
  • Child Development

Background:

  • Cluttering is a speech disorder characterized by rapid, dysrhythmic, or disordered speech.
  • Auditory processing skills are crucial for effective communication and language development.
  • Previous research suggests potential auditory processing deficits in individuals who clutter.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate auditory processing differences in children who clutter compared to typically developing peers.
  • To evaluate performance on dichotic listening, auditory attention, and time-compressed speech tasks.
  • To explore the impact of directed attention on auditory processing in children who clutter.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study involving 6 children who clutter and 6 matched control subjects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Administration of four auditory processing tests: dichotic listening, Staggered Spondaic Word Test, auditory attention, and time-compressed speech.
  • Analysis of performance scores to identify group differences.
  • Main Results:

    • Children who clutter showed greater improvement in dichotic listening with directed attention.
    • Both groups improved with directed attention, but cluttering children exhibited a larger percentage of change.
    • Cluttering children performed significantly poorer on competing conditions of the Staggered Spondaic Word Test.
    • No significant differences were observed in auditory attention or time-compressed speech tasks.

    Conclusions:

    • Children who clutter exhibit unique patterns of auditory processing, especially concerning dichotic stimuli.
    • Directed attention strategies may differentially benefit children who clutter.
    • Findings suggest potential diagnostic implications for auditory processing assessments in cluttering.
    • Further research is needed to understand the neural underpinnings of these auditory differences.