Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
On perceived conflicts between religion and science: the role of fundamentalism and right-wing authoritarianism
A S Westman1, J Willink, J W McHoskey
1Department of Psychology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti 48197, USA. Psy_Westman@online.emich.edu
Abstract:
Volunteers from fundamentalist churches and a Psychology of Religion class (N = 77) completed Altemeyer and Hunsberger's 1992 Fundamentalism Scale, Altemeyer's 1988 Right-wing Authoritarianism Scale, and answered questions about science, religion, and their relationship. Scores on the scales were highly positively correlated. Neither orientation correlated with seeing science as improving life, and both correlated with being troubled by newer developments in science such as organ transplants or genetic engineering. Partial correlations showed that both orientations favored religious beliefs over scientific data when there was a perceived conflict. Three subscales of right-wing authoritarianism clarified how authoritarianism correlated with other measures, thereby supporting a multidimensional conceptualization of right-wing authoritarianism.
Related Concept Videos
The Scientific Method
Group Polarization
The Scientific Method
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Impact of Groups on Groups
Personal Choice and Fate Attributions

