Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2026
06:35
Construction and Systematical Symmetric Studies of a Series of Supramolecular Clusters with Binary or Ternary Ammonium Triphenylacetates
Published on: February 15, 2016
Quantitative chirality/enantioselectivity relations in large random supramolecular structures
1Institute of Chemistry and the Lise Meitner Minerva Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
Chemistry (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany)
|June 7, 2000
Summary
Chiral selectors can switch enantioselectivity preference within a series of probes, revealing a "resonance of recognition" beyond the simple key-lock model. This complex interplay of shape and chirality offers new insights into molecular recognition.
Area of Science:
- Stereochemistry
- Computational Chemistry
- Materials Science
Background:
- Chirality is crucial in molecular recognition and interactions.
- Understanding the relationship between molecular shape and enantioselectivity is key to designing selective processes.
- Current models often simplify the complex geometric factors influencing chiral interactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the quantitative relationship between geometric chirality measurements and enantioselectivity.
- To explore how the shape and chirality of selectors and selectands influence recognition.
- To develop a more nuanced understanding of chiral interactions beyond the classical key-lock concept.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing a model system of 2D chiral selectors (diffusion limited aggregates) and 2D chiral S-shaped probes (selectands).
- Employing quantitative geometric chirality measurements to analyze shape-enantioselectivity relationships.
- Analyzing homologous series of selectands to observe changes in enantioselectivity.
Main Results:
- Enantioselectivity can switch preference (e.g., from right to left enantiomer) within a homologous series of selectands.
- At the switch point, the chiral selector behaves as achiral.
- A
- resonance of recognition
- was observed, indicating varying degrees of recognition rather than a simple binary interaction.
- Isochiral selectands (same chirality value) can be recognized differently.
- Handedness can be assigned to random objects.
Conclusions:
- Molecular recognition is a complex interplay of specific geometric details and global chirality parameters.
- The classical key-lock model is insufficient; a resolution-based approach is proposed for chiral interactions.
- This study provides a foundation for understanding and predicting enantioselectivity based on detailed geometric and chiral properties.
Related Concept Videos
02:21Naming Enantiomers
The naming of enantiomers employs the Cahn–Ingold–Prelog rules that involve assigning priorities to different substituent groups at a chiral center. Each enantiomer, being a distinct molecule, is assigned a unique name by the Cahn–Ingold–Prelog (CIP) rules, also called the R–S system. The prefix R- or S- attached to the chiral centers in an enantiomer is dependent on the spatial arrangement of the four substituents on the chiral center. The R–S system essentially comprises three steps:...
02:24Properties of Enantiomers and Optical Activity
It is essential to understand the difference between chiral and achiral interactions and the implications thereof in optical activity and their applications. Just as our feet, which are chiral, interact uniquely with chiral objects, such as a pair of shoes, but identically with achiral socks, enantiomers of a molecule exhibit different properties only when they interact with other chiral media. An example of a significant implication from this facet is the phenomenon known as optical activity,...
02:25Molecules with Multiple Chiral Centers
Molecules that possess multiple chiral centers can afford a large number of stereoisomers. For instance, while some molecules like 2-butanol have one chiral center, defined as a tetrahedral carbon atom with four different substituents attached, several molecules like butane-2,3-diol have multiple chiral centers. A simple formula to predict the number of stereoisomers possible for a molecule with n chiral centers is 2n. However, there can be a lower number where some of the stereoisomers are...
02:30Chirality at Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Sulfur
Chirality is most prevalent in carbon-based tetrahedral compounds, but this important facet of molecular symmetry extends to sp3-hybridized nitrogen, phosphorus and sulfur centers, including trivalent molecules with lone pairs. Here, the lone pair behaves as a functional group in addition to the other three substituents to form an analogous tetrahedral center that can be chiral.
A consequence of chirality is the need for enantiomeric resolution. While this is theoretically possible for all...
A consequence of chirality is the need for enantiomeric resolution. While this is theoretically possible for all...
02:05Prochirality
The concept of prochirality leads to the nomenclature of the individual faces of a molecule and plays a crucial role in the enantioselective reaction. It is a concept where two or more achiral molecules react to produce chiral products. A typical process is the reaction of an achiral ketone to generate a chiral alcohol. Here, the achiral reactant reacts with an achiral reducing agent, sodium borohydride, to generate an equimolar mixture of the chiral enantiomers of the product. For example, an...
02:30Chirality in Nature
Chirality is the most intriguing yet essential facet of nature, governing life’s biochemical processes and precision. It can be observed from a snail shell pattern in a macroscopic world to an amino acid, the minutest building block of life. Most of the snails around the world have right-coiled shells because of the intrinsic chirality in their genes. All the amino acids present in the human body exist in an enantiomerically pure state, except for glycine - the sole achiral amino acid. The...