Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Synthetic risks, risk potency, and carcinogen regulation.

W K Viscusi, J K Hakes

    Journal of Policy Analysis and Management : [The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management]
    |June 10, 2000
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Gambling problems in treatment for affective disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC).

    Journal of affective disorders·2016
    Same author

    Mortality risk perceptions: a Bayesian reassessment.

    Journal of risk and uncertainty·2002
    Same author

    Stringency of workplace air contaminant exposure limits: a case study of OSHA risk management.

    Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2000
    Same author

    Constructive cigarette regulation.

    Duke law journal·1999
    Same author

    Alternative approaches to valuing intangible health losses: the evidence for multiple sclerosis.

    Journal of health economics·1998
    Same author

    Asymmetric assessments in valuing pharmaceutical risks.

    Medical care·1996
    Same journal

    Insurance coverage and provision of opioid disorder treatment: Evidence from Medicare.

    Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management]·2026
    Same journal

    "When I Can Make Them Smile": Cash Transfers and the Joys of Mothering in the Context of Poverty.

    Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management]·2026
    Same journal

    Housing Quality Improvement and Health Care Utilization: A Regression Discontinuity Study.

    Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management]·2026
    Same journal

    Can Machine Learning Target Health Care Fraud? Evidence from Medicare Hospitalizations.

    Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management]·2026
    Same journal

    CRIMINAL DETERRENCE: EVIDENCE FROM AN INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL ANALYSIS OF 24/7 SOBRIETY.

    Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management]·2025
    Same journal

    Monthly unconditional income supplements starting at birth: Experiences among mothers of young children with low incomes in the U.S.

    Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management]·2024
    See all related articles

    Synthetic chemicals face higher regulation probability, driven by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Risk potency influences Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) but not FDA regulation.

    Area of Science:

    • Environmental Science
    • Toxicology
    • Regulatory Science

    Background:

    • Chemical regulation is complex, influenced by various factors including risk potency and chemical type.
    • Understanding regulatory agency decision-making is crucial for public health and environmental protection.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze determinants influencing chemical regulation probability.
    • To assess the roles of risk potency and chemical synthesis in regulatory decisions by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of a comprehensive dataset of over 350 chemicals tested for carcinogenicity.
    • Statistical control for differences in risk potency and noncancer risks across chemicals.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative assessment of regulatory patterns among different U.S. federal agencies.

    • Main Results:

    • Synthetic chemicals exhibit a significantly higher overall probability of regulation, primarily due to FDA actions.
    • Risk potency positively correlates with EPA and OSHA regulation likelihood but inversely with FDA regulation.
    • The FDA disproportionately targets synthetic chemicals and those with lower cancer risk.

    Conclusions:

    • Regulatory patterns vary significantly among agencies, with distinct targeting strategies.
    • The FDA's regulatory approach prioritizes synthetic chemicals and lower cancer risks, contrasting with EPA and OSHA's focus on risk potency.
    • Findings suggest a more nuanced and sensible EPA performance than often criticized.