Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Constructive cigarette regulation.

W K Viscusi1

  • 1Harvard Law School, USA.

Duke Law Journal
|November 11, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study advocates for a shift from adversarial tobacco regulation to a constructive approach. It suggests the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should promote cigarette safety innovations and provide comparative risk information to consumers.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mortality risk perceptions: a Bayesian reassessment.

Journal of risk and uncertainty·2002
Same author

Synthetic risks, risk potency, and carcinogen regulation.

Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management]·2000
Same author

Alternative approaches to valuing intangible health losses: the evidence for multiple sclerosis.

Journal of health economics·1998
Same author

Asymmetric assessments in valuing pharmaceutical risks.

Medical care·1996
Same author

Deterring inefficient pharmaceutical litigation: an economic rationale for the FDA regulatory compliance defense.

Specialty law digest. Health care law·1996
Same author

Workers' compensation and injury duration: evidence from a natural experiment.

The American economic review·1995
Same journal

Strange Bedfellows: Native American Tribes, Big Pharma, and the Legitimacy of Their Alliance.

Duke law journal·2019
Same journal

The Promising Viral Threat to Bacterial Resistance: the Uncertain Patentability of Phage Therapeutics and the Necessity of Alternative Incentives.

Duke law journal·2019
Same journal

Deviancy, Dependency, and Disability: the Forgotten History of Eugenics and Mass Incarceration.

Duke law journal·2018
Same journal

A Violent Birth: Reframing Coerced Procedures During Childbirth as Obstetric Violence.

Duke law journal·2018
Same journal

Don’t Try This at Home: the FDA’s Restrictive Regulation of Home Testing Devices.

Duke law journal·2018
Same journal

An administrative right to be free from sexual violence? Title IX enforcement in historical and institutional perspective.

Duke law journal·2017
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Public Health Policy
  • Consumer Behavior
  • Risk Analysis

Background:

  • Current tobacco regulation often employs an adversarial approach, including litigation and expanded regulatory power.
  • Existing regulatory frameworks may not adequately address consumer understanding of comparative cigarette risks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a shift from adversarial to a constructive approach in tobacco regulation.
  • To advocate for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to foster technological innovations for cigarette safety.
  • To promote informed consumer risk-taking by providing accessible risk information.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of current regulatory approaches to tobacco.
  • Review of consumer knowledge and information exposure regarding smoking risks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Proposal for government intervention in information dissemination.

    • Main Results:

    • Consumers are aware smoking is risky but lack data on comparative brand risks.
    • An adversarial approach to tobacco regulation may be less effective than a collaborative one.
    • Informed consumer choice can potentially minimize smoking-related health hazards.

    Conclusions:

    • The FDA should adopt a proactive role in promoting cigarette safety innovations.
    • Government dissemination of comparative risk data empowers informed consumer decisions.
    • Shifting policy towards informed risk-taking respects adult autonomy while mitigating harm.