Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

07:25
A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
Clinical Experience with Intermittent Androgen Suppression in Prostate Cancer: Minimum of 3 Years' Follow-Up
1Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Summary
Intermittent androgen suppression effectively controls prostate cancer, improving quality of life with reduced toxicity. Long-term follow-up in Phase II trials suggests no negative impact on patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Urology
Background:
- Prostate cancer treatment often involves androgen suppression therapy.
- Intermittent androgen suppression (IAS) is an alternative treatment strategy.
- Long-term outcomes and quality of life with IAS require further evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the long-term follow-up of a Phase II trial evaluating intermittent androgen suppression for prostate cancer.
- To assess the impact of IAS on patient well-being, sexual function, and disease progression.
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of IAS in men with locally advanced or recurrent prostate cancer.
Main Methods:
- Prospective Phase II clinical trial involving 87 patients with prostate cancer.
- Treatment initiated with combined androgen blockade, followed by cycles of medication withholding based on PSA levels.
- Long-term follow-up data analyzed for disease progression, survival, and quality of life indicators.
Main Results:
- Fifty patients were followed for a minimum of 3 years, with a mean study duration of 65.5 months.
- Off-treatment periods were associated with improved well-being, libido, and potency.
- Disease progression to androgen independence occurred in 23 patients, with 13 cancer-specific deaths.
Conclusions:
- Intermittent androgen suppression is a viable option for controlling prostate cancer.
- IAS offers an improved quality of life with reduced toxicity and costs compared to continuous therapy.
- Phase II data suggest IAS does not negatively impact patient outcomes, with ongoing trials to confirm survival benefits.

