Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
Universal newborn hearing screening in an inner-city, managed care environment
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Bronchoesophagology, Temple University School of Medicine, and The Temple University Children's Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, USA.
Insights
Universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS) can succeed in challenging environments. Implementing targeted interventions significantly improved follow-up rates for infants who did not pass initial hearing tests.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Audiology
- Public Health
Background:
- Universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS) aims to detect hearing loss early.
- Implementation faces challenges in diverse populations, especially in rural and inner-city areas.
- Difficulties in follow-up care hinder the effectiveness of UNHS programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effectiveness of interventions to improve follow-up rates in UNHS.
- To examine the impact of enhanced support services on infant audiological evaluation.
- To determine the feasibility of UNHS in economically challenged settings.
Main Methods:
- Prospective longitudinal study of a UNHS program using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs).
- Initial assessment of follow-up rates, followed by implementation of targeted interventions.
- Reassessment of follow-up rates after modifications to the program.
Main Results:
- The program screened 95% of newborns in its first year.
- Initial follow-up rates after discharge were 61%.
- Interventions including dedicated staff, childcare, transport vouchers, and streamlined referrals increased follow-up to 75%.
Conclusions:
- UNHS programs can be successful with adequate resources and planning.
- Targeted interventions are crucial for improving follow-up rates in UNHS.
- Effective UNHS is achievable even in economically disadvantaged communities.
Objectives/Hypothesis:
Universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS) programs aim to identify and treat educationally significant hearing loss in the first months of life. Several states have mandated UNHS for all newborns. Such programs have been successful in small, homogeneous populations. As larger states attempt to implement such programs, important obstacles have arisen, particularly in sparsely populated rural environments and in the inner city, where poverty, unstable living situations, and inadequate access to health care make follow-up of infants failing initial testing difficult.
Study Design:
We performed a prospective longitudinal study examining the effects of increasingly complex and expensive interventions designed to ensure that children failing initial hearing screening returned for complete evaluation and habilitation.
Methods:
A UNHS program based on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions testing was implemented at Temple University Hospital, with 2,000 births per year. At 6 months into the program, efficacy was assessed and modifications in follow-up methodology were made in an attempt to improved rate of return of infants failing newborn screening. The effect of these interventions was reassessed 6 months later.
Results:
In its first 12 months, the Temple University Infant and Young Child Hearing Intervention Initiative successfully screened 95% (2,031) of all newborns using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Collecting a complete database profile for each newborn, establishing rapport with the family, and offering immediate follow-up appointments yielded a 61% return rate after discharge. The addition of a dedicated project secretary, free day-care for siblings, and cab vouchers for transportation and the elimination of a requirement for health maintenance organization referrals increased follow-up yield to 75%.
Conclusion:
Given adequate resources and planning, UNHS can be successful, even in economically depressed environments.
Related Concept Videos
Preventive Healthcare Services
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...

