Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
Interpreting R Charts01:22

Interpreting R Charts

R chart, or range chart, is a fundamental tool in statistical process control used to monitor the variability within a process. It complements the X-bar (x̄) chart by focusing on the range of the data, rather than individual values, providing a clear picture of the process dispersion over time.
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum values—of a sample...
Metacognition01:26

Metacognition

Metacognition is a conscious process where individuals are aware of their cognitive and executive processes, such as planning before solving a problem or self-monitoring during reading. For instance, a writer may need help with composing a piece. The situation involves a writer who is working on a piece of writing, but while doing so, they realize that something is missing. They notice that their characters lack depth or details. This realization occurs because the writer is reflecting on their...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment01:17

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...
Hazard Rate01:11

Hazard Rate

The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Smokers' unrealistic optimism about their risk.

Tobacco control·2005
Same author

Accuracy of smokers' risk perception.

Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco·2001
Same author

Perceived probability, perceived severity, and health-protective behavior.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2000
Same author

Accuracy of smokers' risk perceptions.

Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine·1999
Same author

Experimental evidence for stages of health behavior change: the precaution adoption process model applied to home radon testing.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·1998
Same author

Stage theories of health behavior: conceptual and methodological issues.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·1998

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 27, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

What does it mean to understand a risk? Evaluating risk comprehension.

N D Weinstein1

  • 1Department of Human Ecology, Rutgers University, 55 Dudley Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8520, USA. neilw@aesop.rutgers.edu

Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs
|June 16, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Effective risk communication requires understanding potential hazards, likelihood, and risk factors. Research shows the public has a limited grasp of smoking risks, highlighting a need for clearer communication strategies.

More Related Videos

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 27, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Risk Communication
  • Health Behavior

Background:

  • Risk communications aim to improve decision-making regarding hazards.
  • Evaluating communication success necessitates a clear definition of 'understanding'.
  • Understanding personal risks involves knowledge of potential ill effects, susceptibility factors, and harm avoidance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define the dimensions of risk comprehension necessary for informed decision-making.
  • To assess public understanding of specific health risks, using smoking as a case study.

Main Methods:

  • Reviewing literature on risk perception and communication.
  • Analyzing public understanding based on research related to smoking risks.
  • Identifying key components of risk comprehension.

Main Results:

  • Public understanding of health risks, such as those associated with smoking, is often limited.
  • Assessing public knowledge and beliefs about risks presents significant challenges.
  • Key dimensions for understanding risks include nature, likelihood, susceptibility factors, and avoidance difficulty.

Conclusions:

  • A comprehensive understanding of personal risks is crucial for effective decision-making.
  • Current public comprehension of significant health risks, like smoking, is inadequate.
  • Further research and improved communication strategies are needed to enhance public risk literacy.