Inter-rater reliability of the diagnosis of vascular cognitive impairment at a memory clinic
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2026

The 4 Mountains Test: A Short Test of Spatial Memory with High Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Pre-dementia Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: October 13, 2016
C Wentzel1, S Darvesh, C MacKnight
1Division of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Insights
New empirically-derived criteria for vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) show high inter-rater reliability among physicians. This supports their use in clinical settings for diagnosing VCI and related conditions.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Cognitive Science
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Traditional consensus criteria for vascular dementia (VaD) are evolving towards data-driven approaches.
- Accurate diagnosis of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) is crucial for patient management and research.
- Empirically-derived criteria offer a potentially more robust diagnostic framework.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the inter-rater reliability of novel, empirically-derived criteria for diagnosing vascular cognitive impairment (VCI).
- To assess the consistency of VCI classification among physicians in a memory clinic setting.
Main Methods:
- A study involving 36 patients randomly selected from a Memory Disability Clinic.
- Independent chart reviews and diagnoses by four physicians using new VCI criteria.
- Statistical analysis using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to determine reliability.
Main Results:
- A high average ICC of 0.88 (95% CI = 0.80-0.93) indicated significant inter-rater reliability for VCI diagnosis.
- Discrepancies primarily occurred within VCI subtypes or between Alzheimer's disease (AD) and VCI diagnoses.
- Most diagnostic disagreements involved only a single rater.
Conclusions:
- The new empirically-derived criteria for VCI demonstrate high reliability among physicians.
- These criteria can be reliably employed in clinical practice, particularly in memory clinics.
- This reliability supports the construct validity of the VCI criteria in the absence of biological markers.
Abstract:
Consensus criteria for the diagnosis of vascular dementia (VaD) are gradually being replaced with data-based criteria. We report the inter-rater reliability of a new set of empirically-derived criteria for vascular cognitive impairment (VCI). Stratified sampling, with optimal allocation, was employed to randomly select 36 patients from the Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Centre's Memory Disability Clinic. Chart reviews were conducted independently by 4 physicians. Each physician classified the patients as having either: no cognitive impairment, VCI or Alzheimer's disease (AD). VCI was further classified both clinically (VCI without dementia, VaD or AD with a vascular component) and radiographically (infarcts, white matter changes, single strategic stroke). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the diagnosis by physicians of VCI or otherwise was based on a repeated-measures analysis of variance with raters as the independent variable. A significant coefficient of reliability (average ICC = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.80-0.93) was obtained (H(o): rho = 0.80, p = 0.03). Where differences in diagnosis occurred, the discrepancies most commonly resulted within the subtypes of VCI (9 cases) or between the diagnoses of AD and VCI (9 cases). Instances of diagnostic incongruity were typically due to the disagreement of a single rater (10 cases). This study demonstrates a high degree of reliability of criteria for VCI by physicians in a memory clinic, and can also be understood as an aspect of construct validation of those criteria. In the absence of a readily available biological marker for VCI, clinical criteria are necessary and can be reliably employed.