Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it instrumental in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk of epilepsy in surgical patients undergoing general or neuraxial anaesthesia.

Anaesthesia·2017
Same author

Birth month and risk of atopic dermatitis: a nationwide population-based study.

Allergy·2016
Same author

Optimal outcomes for hearing preservation in the management of small vestibular schwannomas.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2016
Same author

Carotid interventions (CEA and CAS) in acute stroke patients: which procedure on which patient.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery·2015
Same author

Outcomes after surgery in patients with previous stroke.

The British journal of surgery·2014
Same author

Effects of sheng hua tang on uterine involution and ovarian activity in postpartum dairy cows.

Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 26, 2026

Video-oculography in Mice
09:43

Video-oculography in Mice

Published on: July 19, 2012

Comparative tracking error analysis of five different optical tracking systems.

R Khadem1, C C Yeh, M Sadeghi-Tehrani

  • 1Image Guidance Laboratories, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305-5327, USA.

Computer Aided Surgery : Official Journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery
|June 22, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Optical tracking system precision, measured as jitter, is crucial for surgical navigation. Both FlashPoint and Polaris systems showed jitter under 0.11 mm, with accuracy depending on dynamic reference frame placement relative to the camera.

More Related Videos

PyOKR: A Semi-Automated Method for Quantifying Optokinetic Reflex Tracking Ability
05:26

PyOKR: A Semi-Automated Method for Quantifying Optokinetic Reflex Tracking Ability

Published on: April 12, 2024

Utilizing vmTracking to Improve the Accuracy of Multi-Animal Pose Estimation in Rodent Social Behavior Studies
07:34

Utilizing vmTracking to Improve the Accuracy of Multi-Animal Pose Estimation in Rodent Social Behavior Studies

Published on: November 7, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 26, 2026

Video-oculography in Mice
09:43

Video-oculography in Mice

Published on: July 19, 2012

PyOKR: A Semi-Automated Method for Quantifying Optokinetic Reflex Tracking Ability
05:26

PyOKR: A Semi-Automated Method for Quantifying Optokinetic Reflex Tracking Ability

Published on: April 12, 2024

Utilizing vmTracking to Improve the Accuracy of Multi-Animal Pose Estimation in Rodent Social Behavior Studies
07:34

Utilizing vmTracking to Improve the Accuracy of Multi-Animal Pose Estimation in Rodent Social Behavior Studies

Published on: November 7, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Surgical Navigation Systems
  • Optical Tracking Technology

Background:

  • Effective surgical guidance relies on precise optical tracking systems (OTS).
  • Dynamic reference frame (DRF) placement relative to the camera impacts OTS accuracy.
  • Quantifying jitter is key to understanding OTS performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the precision of optical tracking systems (OTS) by measuring jitter.
  • To determine how DRF position affects OTS measurement precision.
  • To compare the jitter performance of FlashPoint and Polaris OTS.

Main Methods:

  • Tested FlashPoint and Polaris OTS in five camera/DRF configurations.
  • Utilized a custom linear testing apparatus with software for data collection.
  • Measured jitter within a single quadrant of the camera viewing volume.

Main Results:

  • FlashPoint cameras exhibited RMS jitter ranging from 0.028 ± 0.012 mm to 0.059 ± 0.047 mm.
  • Polaris cameras showed RMS jitter of 0.058 ± 0.037 mm (active DRF) and 0.115 ± 0.075 mm (passive DRF).
  • Both systems demonstrated jitter below 0.11 mm, with differing error distributions.

Conclusions:

  • Both FlashPoint and Polaris OTS meet precision requirements for surgical guidance.
  • Jitter is significantly influenced by the DRF's position along the camera's axis.
  • Understanding jitter is essential for optimizing DRF placement in image-based surgical navigation.