Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Meta-analysis in otolaryngology.

R Alsarraf1, N W Alsarraf, B M Kato

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle 98195, USA. amro@u.washington.edu

Archives of Otolaryngology--Head & Neck Surgery
|June 23, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cost of nonmelanoma skin cancer treatment in the United States.

Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]·2002
Same author

The face lift: technical considerations.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2002
Same author

Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study.

Archives of facial plastic surgery·2001
Same author

The radix graft in cosmetic rhinoplasty.

Archives of facial plastic surgery·2001
Same author

Analysis of the performance characteristics of the University of Washington Quality of Life instrument and its modification (UW-QOL-R).

Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2001
Same author

Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery.

Archives of facial plastic surgery·2001
Same journal

Pathology quiz case 2.

Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2014
Same journal

Pathology quiz case 1.

Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2014
Same journal

Radiology quiz case 1: diagnosis.

Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2013
Same journal

Pair of red and green macaws.

Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2013
Same journal

Pathology quiz case 2: diagnosis.

Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2013
Same journal

About this journal.

Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2013
See all related articles

Many otolaryngology meta-analyses lack individual study data for critical review. While most meta-analyses align with component study medians, a significant portion omits crucial data, hindering thorough analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Medical Research Methodology
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Meta-analyses are crucial for synthesizing research findings.
  • Evaluating the consistency between meta-analysis results and their constituent studies is vital for research integrity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the concordance between meta-analysis outcomes and individual study results in otolaryngology.
  • To evaluate the methodological quality of meta-analyses in this field.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective literature review of 22 otolaryngology meta-analyses published between 1989 and 1999.
  • Analysis involved modified funnel graphs to visualize individual study data and compare median results with weighted means.
  • Methodological quality was assessed based on the evaluation rigor of component studies.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Nearly half (46%) of the meta-analyses did not report individual study results.
  • The results of 46% of meta-analyses were consistent with the median of their component studies.
  • A small proportion (9%) showed disparate results, with significant heterogeneity among component studies.

Conclusions:

  • A substantial number of otolaryngology meta-analyses do not provide sufficient data for critical appraisal.
  • Most meta-analyses demonstrate consistency with their component studies.
  • Discrepant findings in meta-analyses were rare and generally well-explained by study heterogeneity.