Latency and accuracy of discriminations of odor quality between binary mixtures and their components

Subjects made timed, same-different discriminations of odor quality, with the following principal findings: (i) latency reflected accuracy, with difficult discriminations, i.e. those between 50-50 mixtures and their components, requiring more time than less difficult discriminations, i.e. those between unmixed chemicals. This finding demonstrated the face validity of latency as a measure of qualitative similarity. (ii) Latency provided better resolution among pairs of odors than did errors of discrimination. This finding demonstrated the utility of collecting response times. (iii) Latency-based similarities among odors tested previously predicted similarities among pairs not yet tested. This finding demonstrated internal/predictive validity. (iv) A signal detection model assuming a differencing strategy best described the pattern of errors. Subjects appeared to make relative judgements regarding quality. (v) Finally, latency-based similarities between mixtures and their components demonstrated additivity. This finding suggested that binary mixtures fall on straight lines connecting their components in 'odor-space'.