Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Modelling the cumulative risk for a false-positive under repeated screening events.
1Department of Statistics, U-120, University of Connecticut, 196 Auditorium Road, Storrs, CT 06269-3120, USA. alan@stat.uconn.edu
Repeated medical screenings, like mammograms, increase the risk of false-positive diagnoses. This study quantifies that cumulative risk, offering a framework for personalized screening assessments.
Area of Science:
- Medical screening
- Biostatistics
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Screening examinations are crucial for early disease detection, enabling timely treatment.
- However, screening procedures like mammograms can lead to false-positive and false-negative diagnoses.
- The cumulative risk of false-positive results increases with the number of screening events.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the cumulative risk of false-positive diagnoses associated with repeated screening examinations.
- To develop a general framework for investigating this risk at both population and individual levels.
- To enable individualized risk assessment by incorporating evolving patient medical history.
Main Methods:
- Modeling cumulative risk based on the number of screening events until the first false-positive.
- Utilizing actuarial models adapted for life table data.
- Incorporating Cox regression for individual-level modeling.
- Employing a Bayesian inference framework for analysis.
Main Results:
- The study quantifies the cumulative risk of false-positive results from repeated screenings.
- A framework is established for both population-level and individualized risk assessment.
- The models were applied to a dataset of 9773 screening mammograms from 2227 women.
Conclusions:
- Repeated screening increases the cumulative risk of false-positive diagnoses.
- The developed framework allows for personalized risk assessment, considering individual medical history.
- This approach can help optimize screening strategies and reduce unnecessary follow-up procedures.
More Related Videos
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
Relative Risk