Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Errors in scoring objective personality tests.

G Allard1, D Faust

  • 1University of Rhode Island, USA.

Assessment
|June 27, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Climate deteriorations and Neanderthal demise in interior Iberia.

Scientific reports·2018
Same author

Letter: nutritional benefits of rifaximin in cirrhotic patients.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2018
Same author

Letter: liver transplantation for acute HEV infection in cirrhotic patients in France.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2017
Same author

Cortical evoked potentials in spinal surgery.

Orthopedics·2014
Same author

Predicting timothy mineral concentrations, dietary cation-anion difference, and grass tetany index by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy.

Journal of dairy science·2009
Same author

Timothy silage with low dietary cation-anion difference fed to nonlactating cows.

Journal of dairy science·2009
Same journal

Modeling Individual Language Patterns and Psychological Constructs to Generate AI-Augmented Data for Scalable Psychological Assessment.

Assessment·2026
Same journal

The Psychometric Properties of the Perth Emotion Regulation Competency Inventory (PERCI) in Sexual and Gender Minority Adults: Minority Stress and Resilience Correlates of Positive and Negative Emotion Regulation Difficulties.

Assessment·2026
Same journal

Future Orientation Scale: A Psychometric Evaluation Across Health-Vulnerable Samples.

Assessment·2026
Same journal

Spurious Reliability Increase?: The Number of Response Options in the Likert-Type Scale Influences Only Internal Consistency, Not Criterion Validity.

Assessment·2026
Same journal

Measuring Moral Injury Outcome and Distress in High-Risk Populations in Germany: A Validation Study.

Assessment·2026
Same journal

Establishing Psychometric Validity of the PBSS-20 for Sexual Minority College Students.

Assessment·2026
See all related articles

Scoring errors are common in objective personality tests, impacting interpretations. High commitment to accuracy (CTA) reduces errors, even with complex scoring procedures (SPC).

Area of Science:

  • Psychological assessment
  • Clinical psychology
  • Personality testing

Background:

  • Objective personality tests are widely used in clinical and research settings.
  • Previous research on scoring accuracy for these tests is limited.
  • Scoring errors can significantly affect test interpretation and clinical decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the frequency of scoring errors in commonly used objective personality tests.
  • To examine the relationship between scoring procedure complexity (SPC) and scoring errors.
  • To assess the role of commitment to accuracy (CTA) in mitigating scoring errors.

Main Methods:

  • Double-checking the scoring of three widely used tests: MMPI, Beck Depression Inventory, and Spielberger State/Trait Anxiety Inventory.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluating scoring accuracy across three different settings.
  • Analyzing the correlation between scoring procedure complexity (SPC), commitment to accuracy (CTA), and error rates.

    • Main Results:

    • A surprisingly high rate of scoring errors was found in at least one setting for all tested instruments.
    • Higher scoring procedure complexity (SPC) was associated with increased error rates.
    • High commitment to accuracy (CTA) significantly reduced scoring errors across varying levels of SPC.
    • Unforeseen error sources included commercial computer scoring issues and discrepancies in publisher scoring standards.

    Conclusions:

    • Scoring errors on objective personality tests are more prevalent than previously assumed.
    • Implementing strategies to enhance commitment to accuracy (CTA) is crucial for improving scoring reliability.
    • Addressing complexities in scoring procedures (SPC) and standardizing scoring criteria are necessary steps to minimize interpretive errors.