Related Experiment Videos
Comparison of a controlled injection pressure system with a conventional technique
G G Goodell1, F J Gallagher, B K Nicoll
1Naval Dental Center Southeast, Jacksonville, FLA. 32212-0074, USA.
Summary
A conventional atraumatic syringe technique for dental injections resulted in less pain and anxiety compared to a controlled-rate injection system. This traditional method also improved patient tolerance and reduced fear of future dental procedures.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Pain Management
- Anxiety Reduction
Background:
- Dental injections can cause significant patient anxiety and pain.
- Minimizing patient discomfort is crucial for positive dental experiences.
- Novel devices aim to improve injection delivery and patient comfort.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare a foot-pedal controlled-rate injection device with a conventional atraumatic syringe technique.
- To evaluate changes in pre- to postinjection anxiety.
- To assess pain perception, procedure tolerance, and future injection anxiety.
Main Methods:
- 80 endodontic patients completed pre- and post-injection anxiety questionnaires.
- Visual analog scales (VAS) were used to rate pain, overall experience, and anticipated future anxiety.
- Two injection methods were compared: controlled-rate device vs. conventional syringe.
Main Results:
- Patients reported significantly lower postinjection anxiety with the conventional technique.
- Pain perception during injection was significantly lower with the conventional method.
- Overall experience ratings were significantly more positive with the conventional technique.
Conclusions:
- The conventional atraumatic syringe injection technique is superior to controlled injection pressure systems.
- Traditional methods offer better pain perception and procedure tolerance.
- Conventional techniques are more effective in reducing postinjection dental anxiety.