Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results.

J M Nelson-Quigg1, K Cello, C A Johnson

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Davis, USA.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|July 13, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cardiovascular disease and differences between the sexes.

American family physician·2001
Same author

dSIR2 and dHDAC6: two novel, inhibitor-resistant deacetylases in Drosophila melanogaster.

Experimental cell research·2001
Same author

Frequency doubling perimetry using a liquid crystal display.

American journal of ophthalmology·2001
Same author

Operative management of neuromatous knee pain: patient selection and outcome.

Annals of plastic surgery·2001
Same author

Equal access to health care.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2001
Same author

Deacetylase activity associates with topoisomerase II and is necessary for etoposide-induced apoptosis.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2001
Same journal

New Guidelines for Ophthalmic Genetic Studies.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Genomic Copy Number Variants Associated With Strabismus and Amblyopia in the All of Us Research Program.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Xanthophyll Carotenoid Intake, Plasma Levels, and Retinal Visualization in Aging and Age-Related Macular Degeneration: ALSTAR2.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Enhanced Endocytosis and Mitochondrial Stress Underlie Severe Retinitis Pigmentosa With RHO P347L Mutant.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Dual-Hit Myopia Mechanism Unveiled by Multi-Omics: Opn1mw Deficiency Primed the Retina for Exaggerated Response to Environmental Defocus.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Psychometric Performance of Children With Amblyopia During a Tablet-Based Adaptive Visual Acuity Assessment.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
See all related articles

Two models, BINOCULAR SUMMATION and BEST LOCATION, accurately predict binocular visual field sensitivity in glaucoma patients using monocular data. These models offer reliable estimates for assessing functional vision and quality of life.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Vision Science

Background:

  • Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy often affecting both eyes, leading to visual field loss.
  • Accurate prediction of binocular visual field sensitivity is crucial for assessing functional vision and patient quality of life.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy of four different methods for predicting binocular visual field sensitivity using monocular visual field data in glaucoma patients.

Main Methods:

  • 111 glaucoma patients underwent monocular and binocular visual field testing using the Humphrey 30-2 full-threshold procedure.
  • Four prediction models were evaluated: BEST EYE, AVERAGE EYE, BEST LOCATION, and BINOCULAR SUMMATION.
  • Differences between predicted and actual binocular sensitivities were calculated for each model.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The BINOCULAR SUMMATION and BEST LOCATION models demonstrated the highest accuracy, with 95% of predictions within +/-3 dB of actual binocular sensitivities.
  • The BEST EYE (mean deviation) model had an average error of 1.5 dB, while the AVERAGE EYE model showed the poorest performance with an average error of 3.7 dB.

Conclusions:

  • BINOCULAR SUMMATION and BEST LOCATION models are superior for predicting binocular visual field sensitivity in glaucoma patients.
  • These models provide reliable estimates for evaluating the impact of visual field loss on daily activities and quality of life.