Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Three Dimensional Vestibular Ocular Reflex Testing Using a Six Degrees of Freedom Motion Platform
Published on: May 23, 2013
The usefulness of the cervical range of motion device in the ocular motility examination
1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA. bkushner@facstaff.wisc.edu
Objectives:
To determine if the cervical range of motion (CROM) device, an instrument designed to assess the range of motion in the cervical spine, may be suited for accurately quantifying the magnitude of a patient's abnormal head posture, limitation of ductions, or range of single binocular vision at distance fixation.
Methods:
The CROM device was used to measure abnormal head postures in 10 subjects and limitations of ductions in 12 patients by 2 masked observers. In addition, it was used to test the diplopia field in 17 patients at one third of a meter and 6 m. These findings were compared with a standard diplopia field performed on a Goldmann perimeter.
Results:
For 10 subjects with abnormal head postures, the findings of the 2 observers had a mean+/-SD difference of 1.0 degrees +/-0.7 degrees (P=.15, paired t test). For the assessment of limitations of ductions, the findings of the 2 observers had a mean+/-SD difference of 1.1 degrees +/-2.6 degrees (P=.17, paired t test). For the 17 patients undergoing diplopia field testing, the results obtained on the Goldmann perimeter and with CROM device at the same test distance were essentially identical (mean+/-SD difference of 1.3 degrees +/-0.95 degrees; P=.88, paired t test); however, there was a significant difference between the results at one third of a meter and 6 m (mean+/-SD difference of 6.0 degrees +/-1.1 degrees for esotropic patients [P=.001]; mean+/-SD difference of 6.0 degrees +/-2.6 degrees for exotropic patients [P=.002]).
Conclusion:
The CROM device seems to be suitable for testing abnormal head postures, limitations of ductions, and the range of single binocular vision. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:946-950
More Related Videos
08:27Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes
Published on: March 3, 2023
07:24Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane
Published on: August 22, 2025