Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Experience with over 2500 diagnostic peritoneal lavages.

K K Nagy1, R R Roberts, K T Joseph

  • 1The Department of Trauma, Cook County Hospital, IL, Chicago 60612, USA. kngay@rush.edu

Injury
|July 26, 2000
PubMed
Summary

This study examined diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) in trauma patients. Researchers reviewed 2501 DPL procedures over 75 months. They found DPL to be highly accurate with 95% sensitivity for blunt trauma and 100% for penetrating injuries. Most procedures used a closed technique, while open DPL was used in special cases like pregnancy or fractures. Complication rates were low at 0.8%. Both open and closed methods showed similar safety. The authors suggest DPL remains a reliable tool for trauma evaluation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Obesity Paradox in the Trauma Patient: Normal May not Be Better.

World journal of surgery·2020
Same author

Factors influencing the late phase of recovery after bone mineral density loss in allogeneic stem cell transplantation survivors.

Bone marrow transplantation·2016
Same author

Impact of early CMV reactivation in cord blood stem cell recipients in the current era.

Bone marrow transplantation·2016
Same author

The impact of intensive care in a private hospital on patients aged 80 and over: health-related quality of life, functional status and burden versus benefit.

Internal medicine journal·2016
Same author

Calciphylaxis with evidence of hypercoagulability successfully treated with unfractionated heparin: a multidisciplinary approach.

Clinical and experimental dermatology·2015
Same author

Re: Predictive value of cervical length in women with twin pregnancy presenting with threatened preterm labor. N. Melamed, L. Hiersch, R. Gabbay-Benziv, R. Bardin, I. Meizner, A. Wiznitzer and Y. Yogev. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 73-81.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2015

Area of Science:

  • Emergency medicine diagnostics
  • Trauma surgery techniques
  • Surgical decision-making

Background:

Trauma centers rely on diagnostic tools to assess internal injuries quickly. Prior research has shown that imaging and clinical exams have limitations in detecting intra-abdominal bleeding. This gap motivated researchers to evaluate diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) as an alternative. DPL has been used for decades but its current role remains uncertain. No prior work had resolved whether newer imaging methods have made DPL obsolete. The study aimed to clarify DPL's accuracy and safety in modern trauma care. Researchers wanted to determine if DPL is still a reliable diagnostic option. They also sought to compare open and closed DPL techniques. The goal was to provide evidence-based guidance for trauma teams.

Purpose Of The Study:

The researchers aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and safety of DPL in trauma patients. They wanted to confirm if DPL remains a useful tool in trauma centers. The study focused on both blunt and penetrating injuries. They examined whether DPL results align with laparotomy findings. The team also compared open and closed DPL methods. They sought to quantify complication rates across techniques. The goal was to determine if DPL is still a valid diagnostic test. The study aimed to inform trauma protocols and surgical decisions.

Keywords:
trauma diagnosticssurgical evaluationabdominal injury detectiontrauma center protocols

Frequently Asked Questions

For blunt trauma, 100,000/mm³ indicates injury. For penetrating trauma, 10,000/mm³ suggests peritoneal penetration.

Open DPL had 90% sensitivity for blunt trauma vs 95% for closed. It showed 100% vs 96% for penetration detection.

Open DPL was used in 92 cases due to pelvic fractures, previous scars, or pregnancy.

Laparotomy results were compared to DPL findings to determine diagnostic accuracy.

The complication rate was 0.8% across both open and closed DPL techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The team analyzed a prospectively collected database of DPL procedures. They included 2501 cases over 75 months at a level I trauma center. They used red blood cell counts to define positive results. For blunt trauma, they considered 100,000/mm³ as positive. For penetrating trauma, they used 10,000/mm³ as the threshold. They compared DPL results with laparotomy outcomes. They categorized procedures as open or closed techniques. They recorded complication rates for each method. The analysis focused on sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy metrics.

Main Results:

DPL showed 95% sensitivity for blunt trauma and 100% for penetrating injuries. The specificity was 99% across both trauma types. Overall accuracy reached 98% in the study population. Most procedures (2409) used the closed Seldinger technique. Open DPL was used in 92 cases due to anatomical challenges. Open DPL had slightly lower sensitivity for blunt trauma (90 vs 95%). It showed higher sensitivity for penetration detection (100 vs 96%). Complication rates were 0.8% overall, with no difference between techniques.

Conclusions:

The authors found DPL to be highly accurate and safe in trauma evaluation. They confirmed its sensitivity and specificity for both trauma types. The low complication rate supports its continued use. Both open and closed techniques showed comparable safety. The results suggest DPL remains a valid diagnostic option. The authors propose its use in trauma centers where appropriate. They emphasize the need for proper technique and interpretation. The findings support maintaining DPL as part of trauma protocols.

The authors propose DPL remains a valid diagnostic tool for both blunt and penetrating trauma.