Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Direct comparison of auditory implicit memory tests.

M Pilotti1, E T Bergman, D A Gallo

  • 1Department of Psychology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA. mpilotti@artsci.wustl.edu

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|July 26, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Higher strains in the inner region of the meniscus indicate a potential source for degeneration.

Journal of biomechanics·2015
Same author

Cognitive psychology. Forgetting the presidents.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2014
Same author

Auditory priming in an implicit memory task that emphasizes surface processing.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Inhibiting effects of recall.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Inferring decay in short-term memory: The issue of capacity.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Editorial.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The role of eye movements and covert shifts of attention in working and long-term memory retrieval.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The effect of source expertise on the persuasiveness and sharing of health information on social media: A systematic review.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Memory tests are sensitive to how information is presented. Auditory memory tests, both implicit and explicit, vary in their ability to recall perceptually encoded study details.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • Perceptual characteristics of stimuli influence memory encoding and retrieval.
  • Previous research has explored modality effects in memory, but less is known about the role of voice.
  • Implicit and explicit memory systems may exhibit differential sensitivity to perceptual details.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the sensitivity of implicit and explicit memory tests to perceptual information presented during auditory study.
  • To determine how modality (visual vs. auditory) and voice changes affect performance across different types of memory tests.
  • To elucidate the relationship between stimulus perception and memory retrieval in auditory-based tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Four implicit memory tests and two explicit memory tests were administered.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimuli were presented auditorily during study, with variations in modality (visual vs. auditory) and voice between study and test phases.
  • Performance was measured by examining priming effects in implicit tests and recall/recognition accuracy in explicit tests.

    • Main Results:

    • Visual presentation of stimuli reduced priming in all implicit memory tests compared to auditory presentation.
    • Changes in voice between study and test impaired implicit memory tests requiring identification of degraded words, but not those relying on word fragment completion.
    • Modality effects were observed in cued recall, while voice effects were prominent in recognition, without modality effects.

    Conclusions:

    • Auditory memory tests, encompassing both implicit and explicit forms, demonstrate varying degrees of sensitivity to the perceptual details encoded during the study phase.
    • The findings highlight distinct patterns of modality and voice effects across different implicit and explicit memory measures.
    • This research underscores the importance of considering perceptual characteristics when designing and interpreting memory experiments.