Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2026

11:25
Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
Published on: October 11, 2010
Direct comparison of auditory implicit memory tests
M Pilotti1, E T Bergman, D A Gallo
1Department of Psychology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA. mpilotti@artsci.wustl.edu
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|July 26, 2000
Summary
Memory tests are sensitive to how information is presented. Auditory memory tests, both implicit and explicit, vary in their ability to recall perceptually encoded study details.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Human Memory
Background:
- Perceptual characteristics of stimuli influence memory encoding and retrieval.
- Previous research has explored modality effects in memory, but less is known about the role of voice.
- Implicit and explicit memory systems may exhibit differential sensitivity to perceptual details.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the sensitivity of implicit and explicit memory tests to perceptual information presented during auditory study.
- To determine how modality (visual vs. auditory) and voice changes affect performance across different types of memory tests.
- To elucidate the relationship between stimulus perception and memory retrieval in auditory-based tasks.
Main Methods:
- Four implicit memory tests and two explicit memory tests were administered.
- Stimuli were presented auditorily during study, with variations in modality (visual vs. auditory) and voice between study and test phases.
- Performance was measured by examining priming effects in implicit tests and recall/recognition accuracy in explicit tests.
Main Results:
- Visual presentation of stimuli reduced priming in all implicit memory tests compared to auditory presentation.
- Changes in voice between study and test impaired implicit memory tests requiring identification of degraded words, but not those relying on word fragment completion.
- Modality effects were observed in cued recall, while voice effects were prominent in recognition, without modality effects.
Conclusions:
- Auditory memory tests, encompassing both implicit and explicit forms, demonstrate varying degrees of sensitivity to the perceptual details encoded during the study phase.
- The findings highlight distinct patterns of modality and voice effects across different implicit and explicit memory measures.
- This research underscores the importance of considering perceptual characteristics when designing and interpreting memory experiments.

