Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Some influences on cognitive development in a group of very low birthweight infants at four years
1Child Development Unit, National Women's Hospital, Auckland.
Insights
Very low birthweight children (<1,000 grams) and those born preterm (<28 weeks gestation) face higher risks for lower cognitive scores and behavioral issues, impacting school readiness.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Child Psychology
Background:
- Premature birth and low birthweight are associated with long-term developmental challenges.
- Socioeconomic status significantly influences child development and educational outcomes.
- Early identification of at-risk children is crucial for timely intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate cognitive and behavioral outcomes at four years of age in children born with low birthweight (<1,500 grams).
- To examine the influence of gestational age, birthweight, and socioeconomic status on these outcomes.
- To identify specific risk factors for poor academic adjustment.
Main Methods:
- Longitudinal audit of 91 children born in 1993 with birthweights <1,500 grams.
- Assessment using the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale and Conners' Parent Rating Scales.
- Clinical evaluation and parent interviews for comprehensive developmental and behavioral data.
Main Results:
- Children born after 28 weeks gestation and weighing >=1,000 grams demonstrated higher scores in Abstract Visual Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning.
- Lower socioeconomic status was linked to poorer performance in language and cognitive tasks.
- Children in the lowest socioeconomic group exhibited more learning problems and higher hyperactivity scores.
Conclusions:
- While overall cognitive performance was within the average range, specific subgroups are at higher risk.
- Children <1,000 grams birthweight, <28 weeks gestation, or <1,500 grams with low socioeconomic status parents are at risk for lower scores.
- These cognitive and behavioral patterns may impede adjustment to formal education, particularly in complex problem-solving scenarios.
Aim:
To report the findings of an audit of 91 < 1,500 grams birthweight children at four years of age and consider the cognitive and behavioural results in the light of gestation, birthweight and socio-economic status.
Method:
Children born in 1993 were assessed using the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Conners' Parent Rating Scales and clinical evaluation. Parent interview provided further information on development, health and behaviour.
Results:
Significant differences were demonstrated in a number of comparisons. For the Stanford-Binet results, children >28 weeks gestation obtained higher mean scores than those of shorter gestation for Abstract Visual Reasoning (representing cognitive skills such as spatial perception and visual - motor coordination), and Quantitative Reasoning (which includes numerical ability). In the case of birthweight, the mean score for children > or = 1,000 grams was higher on Quantitative Reasoning than that obtained by the lower birthweight group. When socioeconomic status classification was introduced, a number of differences in test scores were apparent, with children whose parents were in the lowest classification consistently performing less well. Quality of language results followed the same pattern. Analysis of the Conners' Scales identified this low socio-economic status group as having more learning problems and higher scores on the Hyperactivity Index than those whose parents were in the highest socioeconomic status group.
Conclusion:
Results for cognitive performance on the Stanford-Binet Scale were within one standard deviation of the mean, for the study population as a group. However, findings suggested that children <1,000 grams birthweight, or <28 weeks gestation, and those <1,500 grams with parents in the lowest socio-economic group, were at particular risk of achieving lower scores prior to school entry. Their pattern of cognitive ability and behaviour could inhibit their adjustment to formal education when complex concepts require problem solving at a more advanced level.
Related Concept Videos
Biological Influences on Intelligence
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
The Nativist Approach
Information Processing Approach
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Stella Chess...
Relationship with Parents: Attachment

