Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Flawed meta-analyses comparing psychotherapy with pharmacotherapy.

D F Klein1

  • 1Department of Therapeutics, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA. donaldk737@aol.com

The American Journal of Psychiatry
|July 27, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Meta-analyses claiming to compare psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy in psychiatric disorders are invalid. Critically evaluating study designs reveals flawed comparisons and inadequate data, questioning treatment efficacy conclusions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

RDoC is adverse to scientific creativity.

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2016
Same author

Commentary on 'Psychology and pharmacology in the treatment of anxiety disorders: co-operation or confrontation?'.

Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)·2012
Same author

Controlled cross-over study in normal subjects of naloxone-preceding-lactate infusions; respiratory and subjective responses: relationship to endogenous opioid system, suffocation false alarm theory and childhood parental loss.

Psychological medicine·2010
Same author

Atypical depression: current status and relevance to melancholia.

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum·2007
Same author

Respiratory variability in panic disorder.

Depression and anxiety·2001
Same author

Acute panic inventory symptoms during CO(2) inhalation and room-air hyperventilation among panic disorder patients and normal controls.

Depression and anxiety·2001

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Meta-analyses frequently synthesize findings from diverse studies to compare treatment efficacies.
  • Quantitative comparisons of psychotherapy versus pharmacotherapy in psychiatric disorders are common in the literature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the invalidity of meta-analyses that quantitatively compare psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for psychiatric disorders.
  • To highlight methodological flaws in existing meta-analyses within this domain.

Main Methods:

  • Retrieved studies from four meta-analyses for critical evaluation of their designs.
  • Assessed the quality, blinding, randomization, and control status of included studies.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Included studies were heterogeneous, lacking uniform blinding, randomization, and control.
  • Studies often failed to directly address comparative efficacy or lacked assay sensitivity.
  • Effect sizes were derived from disparate and methodologically compromised studies.

Conclusions:

  • Caution is essential when interpreting meta-analytic conclusions without scrutinizing individual study designs.
  • Indirect and confounded comparisons lead to poorly founded estimates of relative treatment efficacy.
  • Meta-analyses relying on flawed or insensitive studies are inadequate for informing treatment guidelines.