Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures01:26

Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures

Effective preventive measures for coronary artery disease (CAD) focus on controlling modifiable risk factors, including cholesterol abnormalities and lifestyle changes.Cholesterol ManagementFirst, the Mediterranean diet and the American Heart Association advocate for maintaining low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels below 100 mg/dL, with a more stringent recommendation of below 70 mg/dL for individuals at high risk. LDL cholesterol, often termed "bad cholesterol," can lead to the...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care01:27

Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

Interprofessional care for coronary artery disease includes pharmacological therapy and revascularization procedures.Pharmacological therapy for Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) aims to manage symptoms, prevent complications, and improve patient outcomes through various classes of medications:Antiplatelet Agents:Aspirin and Clopidogrel: These medications inhibit platelet aggregation, preventing blood clots, which is crucial for avoiding heart attacks and strokes. Doctors often prescribe these...
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction01:30

Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) encompasses a spectrum of heart conditions caused by sudden obstruction of coronary arteries, typically resulting from the rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque and subsequent thrombus (blood clot) formation. This obstruction can lead to partial or complete blockage of blood flow, causing varying degrees of myocardial ischemia or infarction.ACS includes the following clinical entities:Unstable Angina (UA)Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI)ST-Elevation...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies01:30

Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

Diagnosing acute coronary syndrome or ACS begins with a thorough patient history. Notable symptoms include central, crushing chest pain radiating to the left arm, neck, jaw, or back, along with shortness of breath, sweating (diaphoresis), nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and palpitations.It is crucial to note any history of cardiac illnesses and assess risk factors, including age, gender, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and a sedentary lifestyle.During physical examination, vital...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care01:28

Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

IntroductionThe management of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) aims to minimize myocardial damage, preserve myocardial function, and prevent complications.Initial ManagementInpatient management involves continuous cardiac monitoring, preferably in an ICU, focusing on blood pressure, serum sodium, potassium, and creatinine levels, and urine output. Ongoing pharmacologic management is crucial for stabilizing the patient.Supplemental Oxygen: Administer supplemental oxygen if oxygen saturation is...
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management01:26

Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management

Nursing Assessment:Nursing management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) involves taking the patient's history, focusing on primary complaints such as chest pain, dyspnea, and excessive sweating (diaphoresis), as well as other symptoms like back or jaw pain, nausea, vomiting, palpitations, dizziness, and fatigue. The nurse also reviews the patient's history of cardiac events, risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, smoking, family history, and current medications.In the objective assessment,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Self admission for myocardial infarction. Controlled trial.

British heart journal·1983
Same author

The cost-benefit analysis of a coronary care unit.

British heart journal·1972
Same author

Coronary care unit in a general medical ward.

British medical journal·1969
Same author

ANTIBIOTICS IN RECURRENT CHOLANGITIS.

British medical journal·1965
Same author

Prophylactic procaine amide in myocardial infarction.

British heart journal·1961
Same author

Chemical gastroenteritis in the rat.

Gastroenterology·1958

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 20, 2026

A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
18:11

A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis

Published on: December 28, 2012

Intermediate coronary care. A controlled trial.

P C Reynell

    British Heart Journal
    |February 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary

    Intermediate coronary care did not reduce mortality for male patients under 65. While initial resuscitation was more successful, this did not improve overall survival rates after cardiac arrest.

    Area of Science:

    • Cardiology
    • Critical Care Medicine
    • Health Services Research

    Background:

    • Coronary care units (CCUs) have improved outcomes for acute myocardial infarction.
    • The optimal level of care following CCU discharge remains an area of investigation.
    • Intermediate coronary care aims to provide enhanced monitoring and rapid response post-CCU.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the effectiveness of intermediate coronary care compared to general ward care for patients post-CCU.
    • To determine if intermediate care impacts overall mortality and survival after cardiac arrest.

    Main Methods:

    • A controlled trial involving 1000 male patients under 65 years old.
    • Random allocation to either intermediate coronary care (adjacent to CCU) or general medical ward.

    More Related Videos

    Testing Acetylcholine Followed by Adenosine for Invasive Diagnosis of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
    05:58

    Testing Acetylcholine Followed by Adenosine for Invasive Diagnosis of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders

    Published on: February 3, 2021

    Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
    10:28

    Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function

    Published on: March 15, 2022

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jul 20, 2026

    A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
    18:11

    A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis

    Published on: December 28, 2012

    Testing Acetylcholine Followed by Adenosine for Invasive Diagnosis of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
    05:58

    Testing Acetylcholine Followed by Adenosine for Invasive Diagnosis of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders

    Published on: February 3, 2021

    Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
    10:28

    Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function

    Published on: March 15, 2022

  • Intermediate care involved CCU staff, immediate resuscitation equipment, and an emergency call system.
  • Main Results:

    • No significant difference in overall mortality between the intermediate care and control groups.
    • Survival rates post-cardiac arrest were similar in both groups.
    • Initial resuscitation success was higher in the intermediate care group, but this did not translate to improved hospital survival.

    Conclusions:

    • Intermediate coronary care, as implemented, did not reduce mortality for patients discharged from the CCU.
    • The lack of benefit may be due to the low incidence of primary ventricular fibrillation after CCU discharge.
    • Further research may be needed to identify patient subgroups who could benefit from intermediate care.