Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The relation between movement parameters and motor learning.

J B Smeets1

  • 1Vakgroep Fysiologie, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, The Netherlands. smeets@fys.fgg.eur.nl

Experimental Brain Research
|July 27, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fast Responses of the Human Hand to Changes in Target Position.

Journal of motor behavior·2002
Same author

How vertical disparities assist judgements of distance.

Vision research·2001
Same author

Independent movements of the digits in grasping.

Experimental brain research·2001
Same author

Endpoints of arm movements to visual targets.

Experimental brain research·2001
Same author

Smooth eye movements and spatial localisation.

Vision research·2001
Same author

The effect of expectations on hitting moving targets: influence of the preceding target's speed.

Experimental brain research·2001
Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Loading modulates monosynaptic transmission from spindle primary afferents to motoneurons in humans.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Energy-dependent cortical injury thresholds in high-frequency transcortical electrical stimulation: a biophysical study in a rat model.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

Learning to move faster involves changes in movement time and peak velocity. Different time constants do not necessarily indicate distinct learning mechanisms, as a single learning process can explain varied parameter changes.

Area of Science:

  • Motor learning
  • Human movement science
  • Computational neuroscience

Background:

  • Flament et al. (1999) observed differing learning rates for time-related versus magnitude-related kinematic parameters during elbow flexion.
  • This observation led to hypotheses about distinct neural substrates underlying motor learning.
  • The study questions the interpretation of differing time constants as evidence for separate learning mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the interpretation that different time constants imply different learning mechanisms.
  • To propose a theoretical model demonstrating how a single learning process can yield varied parameter learning curves.
  • To compare model predictions with experimental findings on motor learning.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a theoretical model for motor learning.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Simulation of parameter development during faster arm movements.
  • Analysis of time courses for various kinematic parameters within the model.

    • Main Results:

    • The model, based on a single learning process, predicts different learning time courses for various kinematic parameters.
    • Time-related parameters and magnitude-related parameters exhibit distinct temporal changes.
    • Predicted parameter development aligns with experimental observations.

    Conclusions:

    • Observed differences in parameter time constants do not necessitate distinct learning mechanisms.
    • A unified learning process can account for the differential learning rates of kinematic parameters.
    • The model provides a parsimonious explanation for complex motor learning phenomena.