Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Measuring team knowledge.

N J Cooke1, E Salas, J A Cannon-Bowers

  • 1Department of Psychology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces 88003, USA. cooke@crl.nmsu.edu

Human Factors
|August 5, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Disaccharide anthocyanin delphinidin 3-O-sambubioside from Hibiscus sabdariffa L.: Candida antarctica lipase B-catalyzed fatty acid acylation and study of its color properties.

Food chemistry·2020
Same author

Validation of a score to identify inpatients at risk of a drug-related problem during a 4-year period.

Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society·2018
Same author

Dual-energy computed tomography for the detection of focal liver lesions.

Radiologia·2017
Same author

Computerized pharmacy surveillance and alert system for drug-related problems.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2017
Same author

State-of-science: situation awareness in individuals, teams and systems.

Ergonomics·2017
Same author

Convergent synthesis and properties of photoactivable NADPH mimics targeting nitric oxide synthases.

Organic & biomolecular chemistry·2016
Same journal

Compatibility Effects With Simple Lever Tools: A Replication and Extension Beyond Simple Button Responses.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Effects of Egocentric and Exocentric Supervisor Viewpoint Perspectives on Motion Plan Legibility and Decision Support in Automated Spacecraft Docking Maneuvers.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

System-Wide Trust (SWT) Versus Component-Specific Trust (CST) in Multi-Agent Human-Agent Teams: Individual Variability in Trust Bias.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Driver Adaptation to Partially Automated Driving in Urban Environments: Effects of Repeated Exposure and System Capabilities on Drivers' Trust, Monitoring, and Response.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Modeling Human Expertise in a Sanding Task.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Towards Safe and Comfortable Vehicle Control Transitions: A Systematic Review of Takeover Time, Time Budget, and Takeover Outcomes.

Human factors·2026
See all related articles

Measuring team knowledge is crucial for understanding team cognition and performance. This review maps measurement methods to team knowledge features, identifying research needs for better team training and design.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive science
  • Human-computer interaction
  • Team performance

Background:

  • Multioperator tasks demand complex team-level cognitive processing.
  • Team cognition, including situation assessment and coordination, relies on team knowledge.
  • Team knowledge encompasses generic team mental models and specific team situation models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review methods for measuring team knowledge.
  • To map measurement techniques to specific features of team knowledge.
  • To identify research and methodological needs in team knowledge measurement.

Main Methods:

  • Methodological review of recent efforts to measure team knowledge.
  • Analysis of measurement methods against team knowledge features (type, homogeneity, rate of change).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of knowledge elicitation, team metrics, and aggregation methods.

    • Main Results:

    • Highlights analytical conclusions and empirical data linking team knowledge and measurement methods.
    • Presents empirical results on the relationship between team knowledge and performance for various measurement methods.
    • Identifies specific research and methodological gaps.

    Conclusions:

    • Accurate measurement of team knowledge is essential for advancing the understanding of team cognition.
    • Improved measurement facilitates the design of effective training programs and supportive technologies for teams.
    • Addressing measurement challenges is a prerequisite for optimizing team performance.