Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2026

07:09
In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint
Published on: March 7, 2014
Resorption beneath silastic mandibular implants. Effects of placement and pressure
1Mayo Medical School, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., USA.
Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery
|August 11, 2000
Summary
Silastic mandibular implants can cause bone resorption. Higher implant pressure may reduce resorption, while placement above or below the periosteum showed no significant difference in this animal study.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Veterinary Medicine
Background:
- Silicone rubber (Silastic) implants are used in mandibular reconstruction.
- Bone resorption is a potential complication of such implants.
- Understanding factors influencing resorption is crucial for surgical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of silicone rubber mandibular implant pressure and placement on underlying bone resorption.
- To compare supraperiosteal versus subperiosteal implant positioning.
- To assess the effect of varying implant pressures (minimum, moderate, maximum) on mandibular bone.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, controlled animal trial was conducted on ten adult hounds.
- Silastic blocks were implanted supraperiosteally and subperiosteally in each mandible.
- Implant pressure was manipulated using titanium miniplates, and mandibles were examined after 4 months.
Main Results:
- Mandibular bone resorption occurred under all implanted Silastic blocks.
- No statistically significant difference in resorption was observed between supraperiosteal and subperiosteal placements.
- Higher implant pressures were associated with a trend toward reduced bone resorption.
Conclusions:
- Some degree of bone resorption appears unavoidable with Silastic mandibular implants.
- Implant placement (supraperiosteal vs. subperiosteal) is not a significant factor in minimizing resorption.
- Increased implant pressure may paradoxically decrease mandibular bone resorption, challenging existing assumptions.

