Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A tetrad test for causal indicators.

K A Bollen1, K F Ting

  • 1Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27599-3210, USA. bollen@unc.edu

Psychological Methods
|August 11, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Childhood adversities and risk of posttraumatic stress disorder and major depression following a motor vehicle collision in adulthood.

Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2023
Same author

A Comment on Model Evaluation and Modification.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

The TETRAD Approach to Model Respecification.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

A structural equation model of the developmental origins of blood pressure.

International journal of epidemiology·2008
Same author

How well do perceptions of family planning service quality correspond to objective measures? Evidence from Tanzania.

Studies in family planning·2000
Same author

Quality, accessibility, and contraceptive use in rural Tanzania.

Demography·1999
Same journal

Bayesian evaluation for latent variable models: A tutorial on computing information criteria and bayes factors with the r package bleval.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A stochastic block prior for clustering in graphical models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Three-level vector autoregressive models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Scaling cognitive modeling to big data: A deep learning approach to studying individual differences in evidence accumulation model parameters.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Best practices in multilevel modeling for within-cluster group comparisons: An evaluation of coding strategies reflecting group composition and heterogeneity.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A unified framework for psychometrics in experimental psychology: The standardized generalized hierarchical factor model.

Psychological methods·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a confirmatory tetrad analysis test to differentiate causal and effect indicators in structural equation models. The method aids researchers in theory testing by analyzing "nested" vanishing tetrads within complex models.

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Statistical Modeling
  • Social Sciences

Background:

  • Structural equation models (SEMs) are widely used in social sciences.
  • Distinguishing causal from effect indicators is crucial for valid SEM interpretation.
  • Existing methods may lack specificity in differentiating indicator roles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel confirmatory tetrad analysis (CTA) test.
  • To provide a method for distinguishing causal from effect indicators in SEMs.
  • To offer guidance for applying CTA in various model complexities.

Main Methods:

  • The proposed method utilizes "nested" vanishing tetrads.
  • Researchers can apply provided typical models for determining vanishing tetrads.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The approach accommodates models with fewer than 4 indicators or correlated errors.
  • Main Results:

    • The confirmatory tetrad analysis test effectively distinguishes causal from effect indicators.
    • Illustrative simulation and empirical examples demonstrate the test's utility.
    • The technique is validated as a theory-testing tool.

    Conclusions:

    • The confirmatory tetrad analysis offers a valuable tool for SEM researchers.
    • The method aids in refining theoretical models by clarifying indicator roles.
    • Limitations include indistinguishable models and unknown finite sample behavior.