Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Construct validity of the Continuous Recognition Memory test.

K L Fuchs1, H J Hannay, W M Huckeba

  • 1The University of Houston, TX 77204-5341, USA.

The Clinical Neuropsychologist
|August 11, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

VI. EXECUTIVE CONTROL IN PRESCHOOLERS: NEW MODELS, NEW RESULTS, NEW IMPLICATIONS.

Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development·2016
Same author

V. ELUCIDATING NEW PATHWAYS TO DIMENSIONS OF ADHD SYMPTOMS IN PRESCHOOL BY JOINTLY MODELING EXECUTIVE CONTROL AND FOUNDATIONAL COGNITIVE ABILITIES.

Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development·2016
Same author

II. THE PRESCHOOL PROBLEM SOLVING STUDY: SAMPLE, DATA, AND STATISTICAL METHODS.

Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development·2016
Same author

IV. A NEW LOOK AT THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SOCIO-FAMILIAL CONTEXT FOR YOUNG CHILDREN'S EXECUTIVE CONTROL: CLARIFYING THE MECHANISMS OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES.

Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development·2016
Same author

I. EXECUTIVE CONTROL IN EARLY CHILDHOOD.

Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development·2016
Same author

III. DISTINGUISHING EXECUTIVE CONTROL FROM OVERLAPPING FOUNDATIONAL COGNITIVE ABILITIES DURING THE PRESCHOOL PERIOD.

Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development·2016
Same journal

Unraveling delusional misidentification: A neuropsychological and experimental exploration of a new case of reduplication syndrome.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2026
Same journal

Characteristics and clinical correlates of objective medication adherence in older adults with cognitive impairment.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2026
Same journal

Concordance between domain-based neuropsychological profiles and clinical phenotypes in young-onset dementia.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2026
Same journal

Exploring the relationship between self-report and performance-based measures of impulsivity.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2026
Same journal

Correction.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2026
Same journal

TASIT super short: Empirical development of a social cognition screener.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2026
See all related articles

The Continuous Recognition Memory test (CRM) shows construct validity. CRM hits measure learning and memory, while false alarms indicate attention to visual detail in healthy adults.

Area of Science:

  • Neuropsychology
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • The construct validity of the Continuous Recognition Memory test (CRM) requires further investigation.
  • Understanding the underlying cognitive processes measured by CRM is crucial for accurate interpretation of results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the construct validity of the Continuous Recognition Memory test (CRM) using factor analysis.
  • To determine if CRM hits and false alarms load on distinct cognitive factors.

Main Methods:

  • Principal factor analysis was conducted on neuropsychological test variables from 100 healthy young adults.
  • Variables included performance metrics from the CRM test and other cognitive assessments.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • CRM hits significantly loaded on the 'Learning and Memory' factor.
  • CRM false alarms unexpectedly loaded on the 'Attention to Visual Detail' factor, not 'Divided Attention'.
  • Delayed recognition variables loaded on both 'Nonverbal Memory' and 'Verbal Memory' factors.

Conclusions:

  • CRM hits demonstrate construct validity as a measure of learning and memory.
  • CRM false alarms may serve as an indicator of attention to visual detail.
  • The findings support the nuanced interpretation of CRM performance metrics in cognitive assessments.