Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optimizing techniques in screen-film mammography.

R E Hendrick1, E A Berns

  • 1Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Center, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois, USA. ehendrick@radiology.nwu.edu

Radiologic Clinics of North America
|August 16, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Relationship between phantom failure rates and radiation dose in mammography accreditation.

Medical physics·2002
Same author

Rates and causes of disagreement in interpretation of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography in a diagnostic setting.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2001
Same author

A link between chronic asthma and chronic infection.

The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology·2001
Same author

Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations.

Radiology·2001
Same author

Breast imaging using an amorphous silicon-based full-field digital mammographic system: stability of a clinical prototype.

Journal of digital imaging·2000
Same author

Correlation of high-resolution breast MR imaging with histopathology; validation of a technique.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2000
Same journal

Orbital Imaging.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Imaging, Management, and Treatment of Orbital Trauma.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Imaging Findings after Multidisciplinary Treatment for Orbital and Ocular Adnexal Cancers.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Orbital Tumors: What the Radiologist Needs to Know from the Orbital Surgeon's Perspective.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Multidisciplinary Management of Tumors of the Orbit.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Skull Base, Bone, Pituitary-Regions around Orbit that Affect Vision.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Optimizing mammography techniques involves careful selection of film, processing, exposure factors, and viewing methods. Applying fundamental physics principles ensures enhanced image quality and diagnostic accuracy in mammography.

Area of Science:

  • Radiologic Technology
  • Medical Imaging Physics

Background:

  • Mammography is a critical tool for breast cancer screening and diagnosis.
  • Consistent image quality is essential for accurate interpretation of mammograms.
  • Optimizing mammography techniques can improve diagnostic yield and reduce patient radiation dose.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a practical, step-by-step approach for optimizing mammography techniques.
  • To elucidate the role of fundamental physics in achieving optimal mammographic image quality.
  • To guide radiologic technologists in enhancing mammography procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of mammography workflow, from film selection to image viewing.
  • Application of physics principles related to film-screen systems, processing, and exposure factors.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of mammography equipment performance and its impact on image characteristics.
  • Analysis of image contrast and display parameters for optimal visualization.

    • Main Results:

    • Optimized mammography techniques are achievable through meticulous attention to each procedural step.
    • Proper film selection and processing are foundational for high-quality mammograms.
    • Appropriate technique factors (kVp, mAs) and viewing conditions significantly influence image contrast and detail.
    • Understanding the underlying physics empowers technologists to troubleshoot and refine their techniques.

    Conclusions:

    • A practical, physics-based approach to mammography optimization yields superior image quality.
    • Adherence to a standardized, optimized workflow improves diagnostic accuracy in mammography.
    • Continuous evaluation of equipment and technique factors is crucial for maintaining excellence in mammographic imaging.