Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Radiology turf wars and antitrust law.

T E Colonna1, D Thomas

  • 1Medsupplyfinder Inc, Newark, Del., USA.

Texas Medicine
|August 19, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Nonradiologist providers interpreting radiological images sparks antitrust concerns, mirroring past medical field disputes. This analysis focuses on antitrust issues like group boycotts relevant to radiology turf battles.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Team nursing.

Nursing times·1992
Same author

Lack of platelet-activating factor release during reversible myocardial ischaemia.

European heart journal·1992
Same author

[Diagnostic and therapeutic strategy in patients with multiple arterial disease].

Annales de cardiologie et d'angeiologie·1992
Same author

Risk assessment for aflatoxin B1: a modeling approach.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·1992
Same author

Comparison of skin changes induced on mice by either group A type 12 or group G streptococci.

Experimental dermatology·1992
Same author

IBIS integrated biological imaging system: electron micrograph image-processing software running on Unix workstations.

Computer applications in the biosciences : CABIOS·1992

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Health Economics
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Nonradiologist healthcare providers have historically interpreted radiological images without radiologist assistance.
  • There is increasing encroachment by nonradiologist physicians and radiographer technicians into the domain of radiological image interpretation.
  • This situation is analogous to recent antitrust conflicts in other medical specialties, such as between anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine antitrust issues relevant to "turf battles" in radiology.
  • To identify specific antitrust concerns arising from nonradiologist involvement in radiological image interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of legal and economic literature pertaining to antitrust law and healthcare.
  • Analysis of case law and regulatory actions related to professional scope of practice disputes.
  • Focus on antitrust principles applicable to "turf" conflicts within radiology.

Main Results:

  • Antitrust issues such as group boycotts, tying arrangements, and exclusive contracts are pertinent to radiology turf battles.
  • The encroachment by nonradiologists on radiological interpretation raises potential violations of antitrust law.
  • These issues have significant implications for the practice of radiology and patient care.

Conclusions:

  • Antitrust law provides a framework for addressing disputes over professional scope in radiology.
  • Understanding these antitrust implications is crucial for radiologists and healthcare policymakers.
  • Resolution of these turf battles may involve complex legal and economic considerations.

Related Experiment Videos