Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Are public dose limits necessary?

P H Jensen1

  • 1Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark. p.hedemann@risoe.dk

Health Physics
|August 19, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Removing public dose limits in radiation protection can reduce confusion and save resources. This revision maintains public safety while improving clarity and perception of radiation risks.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DJ-1 interactions with α-synuclein attenuate aggregation and cellular toxicity in models of Parkinson's disease.

Cell death & disease·2014
Same author

Selective renal vasoconstriction, exaggerated natriuresis and excretion rates of exosomic proteins in essential hypertension.

Acta physiologica (Oxford, England)·2014
Same author

Recombinant mannan-binding lectin (MBL) for therapy.

Biochemical Society transactions·2003
Same author

alpha-Synuclein fibrils constitute the central core of oligodendroglial inclusion filaments in multiple system atrophy.

Experimental neurology·2003
Same author

The glycan structure of albumin Redhill, a glycosylated variant of human serum albumin.

Biochimica et biophysica acta·2001
Same author

Evaluation and ranking of restoration strategies for radioactively contaminated sites.

Journal of environmental radioactivity·2001
Same journal

Assessment of Health Risks of Adults and Children Due to Consumption of Uranium in Groundwater from Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, India.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radiation Protection Abstracts, Volume 46, Number 1.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Specialized Radiological Assets for Navigable Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Virtual and Augmented Reality.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

DoseBusters: A Fully Immersive Virtual Reality Game for Radiation Protection and Detection.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radioactivity in Bottled Drinking Water from Greater Dhaka City and Concomitant Ingestion Doses to Consumers.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Assessment of Radiation Dose and Protection Practices in Neonatal Radiography in NICUs.

Health physics·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Radiation Protection
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • The current System of Radiation Protection causes confusion between dose limits (practices) and intervention levels (de-facto exposures).
  • Post-Chernobyl experiences highlight resource misallocation and contradictory responses due to this confusion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To revisit the System of Radiation Protection and propose a revision.
  • To explore the possibility of removing public dose limits without compromising safety.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the existing System of Radiation Protection.
  • Evaluation of the role of source-related dose constraints and practical restrictions.

Main Results:

  • Public dose limits are rarely limiting in practice when dose constraints are used.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A revised system without public dose limits can maintain, or even enhance, public protection.
  • Removing public dose limits can resolve confusion regarding intervention/action levels.

    • Conclusions:

    • A revised System of Radiation Protection without public dose limits is feasible and beneficial.
    • This revision can improve public perception of radiation risks and optimize resource allocation.
    • The proposed changes offer potential for more effective radiation protection strategies and public health interventions.