Related Experiment Videos
Oxygen uptake kinetics in treadmill running and cycle ergometry: a comparison
H Carter1, A M Jones, T J Barstow
1University of Surrey Roehampton, West Hill, London SW15 3SN, United Kingdom. hele.carter@roehampton.ac.uk
Journal of Applied Physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)
|August 24, 2000
Summary
Oxygen consumption (VO2) kinetics during running and cycling were analyzed. The VO2 slow component was significantly greater in cycling, potentially due to muscle fiber recruitment differences.
Area of Science:
- Exercise Physiology
- Human Physiology
- Sports Science
Background:
- Understanding oxygen consumption (VO2) kinetics is crucial for assessing exercise efficiency.
- Previous research has explored VO2 responses, but direct comparisons between running and cycling under heavy exercise conditions require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comprehensively examine oxygen consumption (VO2) kinetics during running and cycling.
- To compare VO2 responses between moderate and heavy exercise intensities using mathematical modeling.
Main Methods:
- Seven subjects underwent determination of lactate threshold (LT) and maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) for both running and cycling.
- Subjects performed "square-wave" rest-to-exercise transitions at intensities relative to LT and VO2 max.
- Breath-by-breath gas exchange data were analyzed using two- or three-phase exponential models.
Main Results:
- VO2 kinetic parameters were largely similar between running and cycling.
- A significantly greater VO2 slow component was observed in cycling compared to running at 50% and 75% of the delta between LT and VO2 max.
- Specific values for the VO2 slow component were 334 +/- 183 and 430 +/- 159 ml/min for cycling versus 205 +/- 84 and 302 +/- 154 ml/min for running at these intensities.
Conclusions:
- Differences in VO2 kinetics between cycling and running, particularly the VO2 slow component, may be attributed to variations in intramuscular tension and eccentric muscle action.
- These factors could lead to greater recruitment of less efficient type II muscle fibers during heavy cycling exercise.