Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Handling information. Some ethical issues.

W Rogers1, A Braunack-Mayer

  • 1Department of General Practice, Flinders University of South Australia.

Australian Family Physician
|August 25, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Towards texture accurate slice interpolation of medical images using PixelMiner.

Computers in biology and medicine·2023
Same author

Priority allocation of pandemic influenza vaccines in Australia - Recommendations of 3 community juries.

Vaccine·2020
Same author

Consumer acceptability and validity of m-Health for the detection of adverse events following immunization - The Stimulated Telephone Assisted Rapid Safety Surveillance (STARSS) randomised control trial.

Vaccine·2020
Same author

Efficacy of m-Health for the detection of adverse events following immunization - The stimulated telephone assisted rapid safety surveillance (STARSS) randomised control trial.

Vaccine·2020
Same author

Aboriginal community controlled health organisations address health equity through action on the social determinants of health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia.

BMC public health·2020
Same author

A photophoretic-trap volumetric display.

Nature·2018
Same journal

Occupational violence and staff safety in general practice.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

You should get that mole checked out: Ethical and legal considerations of the unsolicited clinical opinion.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

Understanding the decision to commence a dose administration aid.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

Psychological distress and risky sexual behaviours among women aged 16-25 years in Victoria, Australia.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

A mixed-methods feasibility study of routinely weighing patients in general practice to aid weight management.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

The Australian Mid-West Coastal Marine Wound Infections Study.

Australian family physician·2018
See all related articles

General practitioners (GPs) must obtain patient consent for using case notes in audit, evaluation, and research. Ethical challenges arise from accessing patient data and differing consent requirements for these activities.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • General Practice
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • General practitioners (GPs) utilize patient case notes for audit, evaluation, and research.
  • Patient confidentiality and privacy are at risk when accessing case notes.
  • Informed consent requirements differ across research, audit, and evaluation activities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Define audit, evaluation, and research in general practice.
  • Clarify ethical issues related to using patient data for these activities.
  • Argue for the similarity of ethical issues in accessing patient case notes.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review on ethical guidelines for patient data use in general practice.
  • Analysis of ethical considerations for audit, evaluation, and research.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of practical challenges faced by GPs.
  • Main Results:

    • Ethical obligations for patient consent are consistent across many general practice audit, evaluation, and research activities.
    • Accessing ethical clearance can be difficult for GPs.
    • The GP-patient relationship and data de-identification requirements pose challenges.

    Conclusions:

    • GPs have a consistent ethical duty to obtain patient consent for data use in audit, evaluation, and research.
    • Barriers exist in accessing ethical review processes for GPs.
    • Navigating patient confidentiality and ethical committee requirements presents unique challenges in general practice.