Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Grounding policy development within an educational setting: an exploration.

H Bateman1, A Hibble, C Hand

  • 1General Practice and Primary Care Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Medical Education
|September 6, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Culture, Sexual and Asexual Reproduction, and Growth of the Sea Anemone Nematostella vectensis.

The Biological bulletin·2018
Same author

Using learning outcomes in dental education.

British dental journal·2017
Same author

Just One Thing: a novel patient feedback model.

British dental journal·2017
Same author

SU-E-T-533: Evaluating Effective Source Position Corrections during Modeling with Pinnacle Version 9.2 Software for Flattening Free (FFF) Small Field Treatments.

Medical physics·2017
Same author

Developing assessment: involving the sessional clinical teacher.

British dental journal·2016
Same author

Efficacy of a live equine herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1) strain C147 vaccine in foals with maternally-derived antibody: protection against EHV-1 infection.

Equine veterinary journal·2004
Same journal

When I say … 'in situ simulation'.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

Examiner training and calibration for simulated clinical examinations: A scoping review.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

When systems set the limits of supervision.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

From psychometrics to partnerships: Broadening what counts as validity evidence.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

When I say the clinical digital divide.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

Urology education under fire: Quantitative benchmarking of trainer adaptation and competency preservation in wartime Sudan.

Medical education·2026
See all related articles

This study explored using educational events to gather General Practitioner (GP) views on policy development. While discussions were lively, GPs felt uncomfortable using educational events for policy input, highlighting challenges in practitioner involvement.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Medical Education
  • Health Policy Development

Background:

  • Developing regional health policies requires input from frontline practitioners.
  • General Practitioners (GPs) are key stakeholders in implementing clinical governance policies.
  • Educational events can serve as platforms for policy-related discussions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate an approach for eliciting GP participants' views on regional policy development.
  • To assess the reaction of GP participants to using an educational event for policy input.
  • To explore the challenges in involving practitioners in policy development processes.

Main Methods:

  • An educational event was designed to facilitate discussion and record GP trainer views.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participant feedback forms and observation were used to evaluate the approach's acceptability.
  • The study focused on the development of clinical governance policy.

    • Main Results:

    • Observation indicated active and constructive discussions among GP participants.
    • Feedback revealed participant discomfort with using educational events for policy development.
    • The approach highlighted tensions between research, education, and policy implementation.

    Conclusions:

    • Involving stakeholders in policy change is crucial for successful implementation.
    • Rapid policy timelines and research burdens pose challenges for practitioner involvement.
    • Action research and participatory methods may offer potential solutions for future policy development.