Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Maximally efficient two-stage screening.

T Berger1, J W Mandell, P Subrahmanya

  • 1School of Electrical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA. berger@ee.cornell.edu

Biometrics
|September 14, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interpersonal Profiles in Social Anxiety Disorder: Different Settings, Different Outcomes?

Journal of clinical psychology·2026
Same author

Fungal keratitis in Germany : Diagnostics, conservative and microsurgical treatment.

Die Ophthalmologie·2026
Same author

[Fungal keratitis in Germany : Diagnostics, conservative and microsurgical treatment].

Die Ophthalmologie·2025
Same author

Building interprofessional identity in neurology with interactive interprofessional learning: a randomized controlled trial.

BMC medical education·2025
Same author

[Bilateral, central serous chorioretinopathy under BRAF(B-rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma)-/MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase)-inhibitor therapy in metastatic cutaneous melanoma.]

Die Ophthalmologie·2024
Same author

Belantamab-mafodotin-associated keratopathy.

Journal francais d'ophtalmologie·2024
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Group sampling in assays, like DNA library screening, can save costs. This study optimizes two-stage group testing, showing structured approaches are more efficient than random ones for isolating positives.

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology
  • Genomics
  • Assay Development

Background:

  • Group sampling strategies can significantly reduce the number of assays required in applications like DNA library screening and blood testing.
  • Practical constraints often limit group testing to two stages, necessitating specialized efficiency analyses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive formulas for the efficiency of two-stage group testing strategies, specifically extensions of the rows-and-columns technique.
  • To establish an upper bound on the efficiency of any two-stage group testing strategy and compare it to unconstrained multistage approaches.
  • To analyze the efficiency of specific two-stage positive procedures and demonstrate the importance of structured group selection.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of efficiency formulas for extended rows-and-columns group testing techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of an upper bound for the efficiency of all two-stage group testing strategies.
  • Specialization of bounds for two-stage positive procedures where stage 1 positives are individually tested in stage 2.
  • Analysis of multidimensional extensions of the rows-and-columns technique to achieve bounds.

    • Main Results:

    • Formulas for the efficiency of specific two-stage group testing extensions were derived.
    • A new, tighter upper bound for two-stage testing efficiency was established, highlighting the inefficiency of random two-stage methods compared to structured ones.
    • The efficiency bound for two-stage positive procedures was shown to be achievable using specific multidimensional rows-and-columns designs.
    • Randomly selected groups in two-stage positive procedures were found to be suboptimal.

    Conclusions:

    • A two-stage testing limit requires more assays than optimal multistage procedures.
    • Structured, non-random group selection is crucial for maximizing efficiency in two-stage group testing.
    • The rows-and-columns technique and its extensions provide efficient frameworks for two-stage group testing, particularly for positive procedures.