Related Experiment Videos
Mammography status using patient self-reports and computerized radiology database.
B Thompson1, V Taylor, H Goldberg
1Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. bthompso@fhcrc.org
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
|September 15, 2000
Summary
Self-reported mammography use among low-income women showed high agreement with hospital records for ever having a mammogram, but lower agreement for the timing of the last mammogram.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Public Health
- Radiology
Background:
- Accurate tracking of cancer screening is crucial for patient care.
- Discrepancies between patient self-reports and medical records can impact healthcare decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare self-reported mammography use with hospital database records in a low-income population.
- To assess concordance between patient recall and electronic health data for mammography screening.
Main Methods:
- Survey administered to age-eligible women at an inner-city public hospital's internal medicine clinic.
- Patient survey responses were cross-referenced with the hospital's radiology database.
- Concordance analysis was performed on self-reported data versus database information.
Main Results:
- High concordance (82%) was found when comparing self-reported history of ever having a mammogram at the hospital.
- Lower concordance (58%) was observed when comparing self-reported timing of the last mammogram with database records.
- Significant disagreements highlight potential issues in both patient recall and data accuracy.
Conclusions:
- Patient self-reports and hospital databases may not always align for mammography history.
- Potential inaccuracies in the database warrant careful review of individual patient histories.
- Healthcare providers should verify a woman's complete mammography experience before making clinical recommendations.