Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026
07:00
Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking
Published on: April 30, 2020
Task switching and the measurement of "switch costs"
Psychological Research
|September 27, 2000
Summary
This study reveals that residual switch costs in task-switching experiments are significantly influenced by proactive interference from prior tasks. These costs persist due to stimulus-triggered retrieval of competing stimulus-response associations, challenging existing models.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Human Performance
Background:
- Task-switching costs, specifically reaction time (RT) differences between switch and repeat trials, are believed to reflect cognitive control processes.
- Residual switch costs, observed after preparation time, are of particular interest for understanding sustained control mechanisms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the underlying mechanisms of residual switch costs in task performance.
- To test the hypothesis that proactive interference (PI) from a prior competing task significantly contributes to switch costs.
- To propose and evaluate a novel hypothesis explaining between-task interference effects in task switching.
Main Methods:
- Three experiments utilized the Stroop color/word task with neutral stimuli in a double alternation paradigm (alternating runs).
- Participants performed word-reading and color-naming tasks, with reaction times measured for switch and non-switch trials.
- Data analysis focused on residual switch costs and the influence of preceding task performance.
Main Results:
- Long-lasting proactive interference from competing tasks was confirmed as a major contributor to switch costs.
- Non-switch trials were also significantly affected by proactive interference.
- A novel stimulus-triggered retrieval hypothesis of competing stimulus-response associations better explained the observed effects than existing models.
- Switch costs were found to depend on the preceding task's stimulus-response characteristics and recent item-specific experiences.
Conclusions:
- Residual switch costs are substantially driven by proactive interference, specifically from stimulus-triggered retrieval of competing stimulus-response associations.
- Existing models of task switching and task-set inertia do not fully account for the observed long-lasting interference effects.
- Switch costs are influenced by the history of stimulus-response mappings, challenging current theories of residual switch costs.
