Current vena cava filter devices and results

The critical focus in the acute management of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) continues to be the effective prevention of associated life-threatening pulmonary embolism (PE) and the achievement of survival for those in whom such emboli occur. As such, primary treatment for DVT or PE demands adequate anticoagulation with intravenous heparin followed by maintenance oral warfarin for 3 to 6 months. This centered approach successfully prevents 90% to 95% of cases of associated pulmonary embolism. However, under circumstances in which anticoagulation cannot be used, or in which it fails, there is clear indication for placement of a mechanical filter into the inferior vena cava to provide a protective barrier against the passage of clinically significant emboli from pelvic or lower extremity veins. Considerable technical ingenuity and continued evolution of materials and design have propelled the development and number of vena cava filters available for clinical use. Variable data on safety and effectiveness require physicians to match the best filter to each patient's particular situation and anatomy. However, many interventional radiologists and surgeons often base their filter selection on ease of insertion and device cost. Thus, it is paramount that physician users of these devices remember that the primary objective of vena cava filtration is to provide a safe and effective device for permanent implantation. If this objective is not met, the quality of care in the management of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism will diminish.