Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Minimally invasive esophagectomy.

J D Luketich1, P R Schauer, N A Christie

  • 1Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pennsylvania 15213, USA. luketichjd@msx.upmc.edu

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
|October 4, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

2-year survival estimation for decompensated cirrhosis patients of prognostic scoring systems.

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences·2023
Same author

The effect of medication event reminder monitoring on treatment adherence of TB patients.

The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease·2023
Same author

Save the Mekong Delta from drowning.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2022
Same author

In vitro Development of Zona Pellucida-free Porcine Zygotes Cultured Individually after Vitrification.

Cryo letters·2021
Same author

Association of the colistin resistance gene mcr-1 with faecal pollution in water environments in Hanoi, Vietnam.

Letters in applied microbiology·2020
Same author

Clinical and histopathological characterization of paradoxical head and neck erythema in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab: a case series.

The British journal of dermatology·2019
Same journal

A Health Tracking Application Leads to An Avid Cyclist Being Diagnosed with ALCAPA at 52 years old, Warranting a Takeuchi Repair.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

Impact of preoperative and postoperative modern guideline-directed medical therapy on survival following coronary artery bypass grafting.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

Does prior percutaneous coronary revascularization negatively affect the outcomes of subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting?

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

Lymph Node Dissection and Chylothorax - Balancing Oncologic Benefit Against Morbidity.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

Preserved Antegrade Pulmonary Blood Flow in Bidirectional Glenn: Outcomes and Considerations for Staged Palliation.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

Domo Arigato, Mr. Roboto.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
See all related articles

Minimally invasive esophagectomy is feasible and safe, offering potential benefits over open surgery. However, open surgery remains the standard until further studies confirm advantages of minimally invasive techniques.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Oncology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Open esophagectomy is linked to significant patient morbidity and delayed recovery.
  • Minimally invasive esophagectomy shows promise in reducing morbidity, but evidence is limited to small case series.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility and safety of minimally invasive esophagectomy.
  • To assess outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy for various esophageal conditions.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective review of 77 patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy between August 1996 and September 1999.
  • Surgical approaches included laparoscopic, mini-thoracotomy, and thoracoscopy techniques.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Indications included esophageal cancer (54), Barrett's dysplasia/carcinoma in situ (17), and benign conditions (6).
  • Median operative time was 7.5 hours, with reduced times after initial experience.
  • Median ICU stay was 1 day and hospital stay was 7 days, with no operative or hospital mortalities. Major and minor complication rates were 27% and 55% respectively.

Conclusions:

  • Minimally invasive esophagectomy is technically feasible and safe in experienced centers.
  • Further research is needed to definitively establish the advantages of minimally invasive approaches over traditional open surgery.