Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2026
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
A comparison of labial and crestal incisions for the 1-stage placement of IMZ implants: a pilot study
K Heydenrijk1, G M Raghoebar, R H Batenburg
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands. k.heydenrijk@kchir.azg.nl
Purpose:
The aim of this study was to compare the crestal incision with the labial flap design when inserting a 2-stage implant system in a nonsubmerged manner.
Patients And Methods:
Ten consecutive edentulous patients with a severely resorbed mandible (Cawood Class V to VI) that resulted in reduced stability and insufficient retention of the lower denture were included. In all patients, 2 IMZ implants were inserted in a 1-stage procedure in the mandibular canine regions as part of an implant overdenture treatment. In 5 patients, the labial flap approach was used, and a crestal incision approach was used in the other 5 patients. Standardized evaluations were performed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks after implant placement and 12 months after placement of the new prosthesis.
Results:
In the first postoperative weeks, more hyperplasia occurred around the implants inserted by the crestal incision than the labial flap. However, after 1 year of function, no striking differences between the 2 groups were present with regard to the clinical and radiographic parameters.
Conclusions:
From this pilot study, it was concluded that both the crestal incision and the labial flap approach are reliable procedures for insertion of IMZ implants in a 1-stage procedure. However, because of the smaller risk of soft tissue overgrowth, there is a preference for the labial flap approach.
