Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026
14:38
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
Published on: November 2, 2012
Category-specific naming errors in normal subjects: the influence of evolution and experience
1London Guildhall University, London, United Kingdom. klaws@lgu.ac.uk
Brain and Language
|October 12, 2000
Summary
Normal adults found it harder to name nonliving objects than living ones, challenging existing theories on category-specific disorders. This suggests evolutionary factors, not just familiarity, influence object recognition.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Linguistics
Background:
- Category-specific disorders often involve difficulties with living things, with "artifactual" variables like conceptual familiarity proposed as key factors.
- Existing models suggest patient deficits mirror exaggerated normal processes, predicting greater naming difficulty for living items in healthy individuals due to lower familiarity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate normal subjects' ability to name artifact-matched living and nonliving items.
- To test the prediction that normal subjects experience greater difficulty naming living things compared to nonliving things.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a naming-to-deadline paradigm with artifact-matched sets of living and nonliving object pictures.
- Assessed naming accuracy in healthy adult participants.
Main Results:
- Contrary to predictions, normal subjects made significantly more naming errors for nonliving items than for living items.
- Female subjects exhibited more nonliving-thing naming errors compared to male subjects.
- These performance differences were not attributable to category- or gender-based familiarity ratings.
Conclusions:
- Findings challenge familiarity-based explanations for category-specific naming deficits.
- An elaborated domain-specific evolutionary model is proposed to explain both patient deficits with living things and normal subject performance.
- This model accounts for the observed pattern of errors in healthy individuals and the prevalence of living-thing impairments in patient populations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
02:55The Evidence for Evolution
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.The collection of fossils within sedimentary rocks give a record of common ancestry and often depicts the history of evolution.
02:27Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
01:20Evolutionary Psychology
Evolutionary psychology explores the origins of human behavior and mental processes by framing them within the context of natural selection, a theory famously propounded by Charles Darwin. This field asserts that many behaviors common across human societies — ranging from instinctive fear reactions to complex social interactions — arose as evolutionary adaptations. These adaptations enhanced the survival and reproductive success of our ancestors, thereby becoming embedded in the human psyche...
01:15Natural Selection and Adaptation
Natural selection, a fundamental concept in evolutionary biology, is the mechanism by which evolution is driven, favoring organisms that are best adapted to their environments. This process enhances their chances of survival and reproduction. Adaptation, a key outcome of this process, involves genetic modifications that optimize an organism's functionality under specific environmental challenges, such as extreme cold or thinner air at high altitudes.
Beyond physical adaptations, psychological...
Beyond physical adaptations, psychological...
01:23Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
01:21The Nativist Approach
The nativist approach to infant cognitive development proposes that infants are born with inherent knowledge structures that allow them to interpret the world almost immediately. This perspective contrasts with earlier developmental theories, such as those proposed by Jean Piaget, which emphasized a more gradual acquisition of cognitive abilities through interaction with the environment. One key concept in this approach is object permanence — the understanding that objects continue to exist...