Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Do evolutionary processes minimize expected losses?

D B Fogel1, H G Beyer

  • 1Natural Selection, Inc., 3333 N. Torrey Pines Ct., Ste. 200, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. dfogel@natural-selection.com

Journal of Theoretical Biology
|October 12, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Autopsy at Central Park Menagerie.

The Journal of comparative medicine and surgery·2022
Same author

The Relation of the Depressor Nerve to the Vasomotor Centre.

Journal. Boston Society of Medical Sciences·2009
Same author

THE VALUE TO PHYSIOLOGY OF ANTHROPOMETRIC TESTS AND MEASUREMENTS IN THE FORM OF STATISTICS AND THEIR IMPORTANCE TO EDUCATION.

Journal. Boston Society of Medical Sciences·2009
Same author

The further Differentiation of Flagellar and Somatic Agglutinins.

The Journal of medical research·2009
Same author

THE INFLUENCE OF EXERCISE ON GROWTH.

The Journal of experimental medicine·2009
Same author

A step toward computer-assisted mammography using evolutionary programming and neural networks.

Cancer letters·2008
Same journal

An integrative model of FGF2-induced signaling and muscle cell proliferation.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

A Hybrid Reaction-Diffusion and Mechanical Stimulus Model for Mandibular Bone Remodeling under Chewing and Vibratory Loading.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

Integrated tick management strategies in fragmented peridomestic environments.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

Joint likelihood-free inference of the number of selected single nucleotide polymorphisms and their selection coefficients in an evolving population.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

Misspecification of the generation time distribution and its impact on R<sub>t</sub> estimates in structured populations.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

Stability-driven assembly meets Prigoginian informational dissipation. A mean-field ODE comment of entropy reduction and emergent proto-self.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
See all related articles

This study challenges the idea that evolution optimizes organisms by minimizing losses. Computer simulations indicate that natural selection does not favor individuals solely based on minimizing expected losses in decision-making scenarios.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Behavioral ecology
  • Mathematical modeling

Background:

  • Evolutionary theory posits natural selection favors optimal adaptation to environments.
  • Measuring adaptation and defining optimization criteria remain open challenges.
  • Mathematical models often assume individuals minimize expected losses in decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To mathematically analyze and computationally test the hypothesis that organisms are selected to minimize expected losses.
  • To investigate the fidelity of the loss-minimization criterion in evolutionary contexts.
  • To explore how adaptation and optimization are driven by environmental pressures.

Main Methods:

  • Framed the problem of adaptation as a series of decisions with stochastic payoffs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Developed mathematical analyses based on the loss-minimization hypothesis.
  • Employed computer simulations, specifically a version of the k-armed bandit problem, to test the hypothesis.

    • Main Results:

    • The mathematical analysis explored the implications of the loss-minimization criterion.
    • Computer simulations provided empirical data on the hypothesis.
    • Results did not support the hypothesis that individuals are selected to minimize expected losses.

    Conclusions:

    • The assumption that natural selection inherently drives organisms to minimize expected losses is not supported by this study.
    • Alternative or complementary criteria for adaptation and optimization in evolutionary processes may be necessary.
    • Further research is needed to understand the precise mechanisms of adaptation and optimization in variable environments.